|
May
21, 2009
NDP
Leadership
Every
NDP leader would like to follow in the steps of Manitoba
Premier Gary Doer First elected MLA in 1986, Doer became
leader of the Manitoba NDP in 1988. He led his party to three
defeats before becoming Premier in 1999, and continues as
Premier after two subsequent elections.
Like
Doer, NDP Leader Carole James led her party from the brink
of extinction back to full status as the Official Opposition.
After the 2005 BC election the NDP celebrated more than the
Liberals, even though the seat count was 33 NDP to 46 Liberals.
Despite coming within a few thousand votes of winning in 2005,
the NDP subsequently trailed the Liberals by double digits
in the public opinion polls. During the recent election campaign,
the Mustel Group put the NDP 17
points behind the Liberals in mid-April, dropping to a
9
point gap a week before the vote. Similarly, Ipsos
Reid put the NDP 8 points behind the weekend before the
vote.
Perhaps
the NDP was once again on the brink of extinction but its
campaign managed to maintain the status quo. Preliminary
results for May 12th had the NDP at 36 seats and the Liberals
at 49; the popular vote was 42.0% NDP, 46.1% Liberal. An alternative
view, argued by some NDP activists, is that the NDP could
have won had it not run a confused
campaign. Some argue the party could have done better
with different campaign strategists and tacticians, e.g. running
one clear message with different advertising. Supporters of
that view want an internal house cleaning; others would go
farther, noting the buck stops with the leader, who should
have taken charge and spoken out on the economy. The challenge
is to begin the 2013 campaign immediately, as the Liberals
did in 1996 when they refused to give the newly elected NDP
a traditional electoral honeymoon.
For
all its history, the NDP has chosen leaders through the traditional
process of a leadership convention. The party's
constitution was amended after James was elected leader
so the next leader must be elected by a popular vote of the
members. How that will work is up to the Party's Provincial
Council, consisting of one representative from each of the
85 constituencies plus the 35 member party executive, four
youth delegates and the past president. There is no procedure
in the NDP constitution for "un-electing" a Leader.
Unless the Leader resigns, all the party can do to encourage
a change is to set the rules for an election, a procedure
that requires a majority vote of the 125 member provincial
council.
The
Leader of the Official Opposition is paid
the same as a cabinet minister (formally a Member of the
Executive Council with portfolio), 50% more than the six figure
MLA base salary. By not resigning after the May 12th election,
Carole James will receive over $200,000 in additional pay
if she remains as leader until the May 14, 2013 election.
Her pension will be increased accordingly (3.5% per year of
service times highest 3 year average). Many would argue that
it is fair that the Leader of the Opposition be highly compensated.
Apart
from the financial incentives to remain in office, there are
political advantages in delaying a leadership contest. It
is arguable that, given fixed election dates, it is to the
NDP's advantage, if it were going to change leaders, to wait
until 2012. That would give the party momentum from a leadership
race going into the 2013 vote. With that perspective, the
answer James gave with respect to staying on must be seen
as keeping all options open. The party's constitution requires
a convention in 2009 and 2011.
A
lot will happen both in terms of internal party politics and
provincial politics before options start to close in 2012.
In the meantime, James and her colleagues are on probation,
as much or more than Premier Campbell and his new cabinet.
Both parties need to focus on how to engage the half of BC
voters who did not vote. A few small changes there could make
a big change in 2013.
|