|
December
19, 2008
BC
Lowest (for now) in Prescription Costs
"If
cost-drivers in British Columbia were the same as the national
average on an age-standardized basis, total spending on
prescription drugs in that province would be $701 million
higher than was the case in 2007. Most of this difference
($455 million) was a result of British Columbia residents
purchasing fewer prescription drugs on an age-standardized
basis. The selection of lower-cost treatment options within
therapeutic categories also explained a sizable amount ($208
million) of the low spending in British Columbia."
Canadian
Rx Atlas,
2nd Edition (Dec 2008)
At the
same time that Researchers at The University of British Columbia's
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (CHSPR) are
breaking ground with their analysis of prescription drug use
in Canada, the Campbell government appears determined to move
BC up from the lowest spending province to one of the highest
by eliminating the Therapeutics
Initiative. That's the UBC based project, started in 1994,
to essentially provide a balance to the propaganda ("detailing")
that the pharmaceutical industry uses to influence the prescribing
habits of physicians. In April
2008 the Campbell government announced support for a recommendation
to: "establish a new Drug Review Resource Committee (DRRC)
to carry out the drug submission review role currently performed
by the Therapeutics Initiative."
CHSPR
can't be accused of playing politics, releasing its findings
a week before Christmas when most reporters have finished
their yearend review pieces. It will be surprising if their
study, which could save the province billions of dollars,
gets two column inches at this time of the year.
Steve
Morgan, associate director in UBC's CHSPR, doesn't criticize
the Campbell government directly, but anyone reading his research
group's report must wonder why BC would consider in any way
weakening its system that puts patients ahead of pharmaceutical
profits.
Apart
from the normal incentives to control costs while maximizing
returns, in these challenged economic times one would think
that the BC government would embrace Morgan's findings and
ask his research group for advice. The Canadian Rx Atlas reported
that in terms of provincial governments' share of spending
in 2007: "British Columbia had the lowest levels of average
spending per person aged 45-64 ($79), per person aged 65 and
older ($304), and per capita for all ages ($65)." The
Campbell government is jeopardizing that cost advantage as
it moves to reorganize,
weaken or dismantle the Therapeutics Initiative.
The most
likely way government could weaken cost control provided by
the Therapeutics Initiative while keeping its position at
the bottom of provincial costs would be to shift more costs
onto those who need drugs. The Campbell government never has
understood the difference between cost saving and cost shifting.
|