May
5, 2008
"Not
a Dime without Debate"
Many
British Columbians don't know whether the BC Legislature is
sitting or not, and many don't care. That doesn't stop them
from becoming very angry when they learn what is happening;
it is like taking for granted that your car is going to start
until it doesn't. The Campbell government is on the verge
of ramming 23 Bills through the Legislature with virtually
no debate; that's much worse than a car breaking down, that's
a fundamental failure of democracy. As of Friday, May 2nd,
23
Bills had not yet passed second reading, let alone passed
the detailed committee stage that precedes third reading.
Until Campbell came to power in 2001, the rules that governed
the BC Legislature saw the government call the session to
order and the Opposition adjourn it. In other words, debate
would continue for as long as the Opposition wanted to examine
the government's legislation and spending estimates. On most
occasions that meant that BC's Legislature sat into June,
and occasionally into July. Campbell changed the rules and
implemented a fixed legislative calendar, except that in 2006
he didn't honor the calendar, not calling the House until
late November. A major feature of the fixed legislative calendar,
is that according to the amended rules of the Legislature
all designated government business must pass by the pre-set
date for adjournment in late May (or be voted on, which is
the same thing, with a majority government). If the government
and the opposition can't agree on how that will happen, the
government introduces closure (time-allocation) to limit debate
and force budgets and legislation through the Legislature
with little or no debate.
Unless
the Campbell government announces that a substantial portion
of its 2008 spring legislative agenda will be set over to
the fall, it will demonstrate an extreme abuse of power.
The
pending legislation (10 of the 23 Bills were just introduced
last week) includes substantial changes in how British Columbians
live. The carbon tax, the cap and trade system for carbon
emissions, limits on third party advertising before and during
election campaigns, and a change to health legislation that
puts a definition of "sustainability" on the same
grounds as the concepts of universality, accessibility and
comprehensiveness are but a few of the fundamental changes
that the Campbell government appears willing to ram through
without much debate by May 29th.
The
legislature only sits for four days a week, no longer in the
evenings, and it recesses for a week or more in every week
in which there is a statutory holiday, hence, between May
5th and May 29th, it sits for only 12 days. It is outrageous
that the Campbell government would contemplate substantial
legislation with little or no opportunity for scrutiny. It
is not just the Official Opposition that would be offended;
during the period of legislative debate, those who know something
about pending legislation engage the public through the news
media and feed their concerns to the Opposition as well as
lobbying the government. Limiting debate means limiting opportunities
for public involvement in the democratic process.
If
the government forces passage of all 23 Bills that are currently
outstanding by May 29th, its abuse of power may become more
of a political issue than the substance of any of its most
controversial legislation.
|