August
29, 2006
Confidential
Note on Poverty
It
was almost comical to receive a response to a freedom of
information request in an envelope stamped "CONFIDENTIAL
Only to be Opened by Addressee", yet that is how I
obtained the briefing notes that Claude Richmond, Minister
of Employment and Income Assistance, used when he attempted
to minimize the extent of child poverty. Surely the Campbell
government must know that most government documents, especially
those they must release under the Freedom of Information
and Protection of Privacy Act, are public and could be posted
to a government website.
Richmond's
briefing
note began with advice to say "All of us take child
poverty very seriously" before it went on to site job
growth, reductions in the number in welfare recipients,
and tax cuts as arguments for the claim that the government
is supporting low-income families.
In order
to see how badly the Campbell government misrepresents the
extent of poverty, it is useful to keep in mind some basic
statistics that describe the size and income of British
Columbians. Since many of those statistics come from income
tax returns which aren't filed until the April after the
year in which income is received, and aren't tabulated until
some months later, they are always at least two years old.
The most recent tax
data broken down by province and income are for the
tax year 2003.
-
2003
(Oct 1) population: 4,167,719
-
Number
of 2003 tax returns: 2,962,200
-
2003
children under age 15: 707,957
-
2003
number claiming spouse deduction: 409,650
-
2003
employment (Labour Force Survey): 2,014,700
-
2003
BC tax returns with employment income: 1,793,300
Notice
the 11% difference between those reporting employment income
and those counted by Statistics Canada as employed. The
difference has much more to do with how employment is defined
in the Labour Force Survey than it does with any under reporting
of taxable income. While 2,962,200 tax returns were filed
by British Columbians in 2003, only 1,892,330 required provincial
income tax to be paid.
In 2003,
over 98% of the 964,530 British Columbians who reported
incomes in excess of $35,000 ended up paying some provincial
income tax. Many of the 1,997,670 British Columbians
who reported less than $35,000 in income are poor, and many
have children. For the 1,392,700 who reported incomes less
than $20,000, 379,040 didn't pay provincial income tax.
The non-refundable
provincial tax credit of $360 (less 3.6% of income in
excess of $16,000) announced prior to the 2005 election
further increased the number who will pay no provincial
income tax, but their savings pales by comparison with the
break given to high income earners in 2001. The benefit
from a nonrefundable credit cannot exceed the amount owed
in taxes, and the poorest people don't pay much income tax.
In 2003, 616,160 British Columbians reported incomes between
$1 and $10,000, but only 34,170 paid provincial income taxes,
averaging $59.58 per taxpayer; that is all the benefit those
34,170 people will get from the new tax credit. In 2003,
355,080 British Columbians reported incomes between $10,000
and $15,000, but only 137,760 paid provincial income taxes,
averaging $165.32 per taxpayers; that is what the new tax
credit is worth on average to those 137,760 people. By comparison,
the value of the 2001 tax cut can be seen by examining taxation
statistics published by Revenue Canada for tax years 2000
and 2003. The 12,300 who reported incomes in excess of $250,000
in 2003 paid an average of $20,899.59 less in provincial
income tax than they paid in 2000; incidentally, 2,370 of
those lucky folks collected Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits.
The 2001 tax cut is worth more for those 12,3000 people
than the total income tax benefit of more than 1.4 million
fellow citizens who filed tax forms reporting less than
$20,000 in income, and it makes a joke of the few hundred
dollars very low income people saved from both the 2001
and 2005 tax cuts. That is why it is pathetic for the Campbell
government to claim that children living in poverty are
significantly helped by tax cuts. They did the right thing
in eliminating the few income taxes those families paid,
but the amounts are trivial relative to what has been lost
through the reduction in benefits: child protection, legal
aid, welfare eligibility and numerous user fees.
There
are far more people living in poverty than there are people
receiving provincial welfare. In
2003 there were 117,999 "cases" (individuals and
families), 175,640 "clients" (including spouses
and 47,313 children), receiving income assistance in BC.
Richmond's briefing note says the number of children was
down to 35,000 in December 2005, but it doesn't say whether
their parents are on the street or in a job. The number
of "cases" is just 19% of the 616,160 people who
filed income tax returns with income between $1 and $10,000.
Almost half, 46.8%, of the people with less than $10,000
in annual income reported income from employment; 12.4%
report income from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP). A further
638,160 people filed income tax returns with income between
$10,000 and $20,000 with 49.6% showing income from employment,
and 35.8% showing income from CPP. Low income people
include those who are working and pensioners, and vastly
exceed the number of people receiving any form of welfare.
Helping those people requires social housing programs, tough
enforcement of employment standards and opportunities for
training and advancement. The very least the Campbell government
could do is to acknowledge that hundreds of thousands of
British Columbians are not sharing the province's prosperity.
|
| |
|