Strategic Thoughts

bannerspacerAbout Me | Mail Me | Linksbannerspacer2

February 6, 2006

2010 Olympic Lotto

On the provincial government's website at gov.bc.ca you'll find a news release and "backgrounder" about the "SportsFunder" lottery in celebration of the 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games, but you won't find a word about the $110 million overrun that was announced 24 hours later. The news backgrounder is a little misleading when it claims that the new lottery "is the first cause-specific lottery in the BC Lottery Corporation's history". As part of its ongoing effort to expand gambling in BC the Campbell government, and its agent the BC Lottery Corporation (BCLC), announced a similar scheme in October 2003 with respect to the Canucks scratch and win tickets. The 2010 announcement is worth about 5 times more to the Vancouver Organizing Committee for allowing BCLC to use its official logo; the estimated $10 million is a drop in the bucket relative to the budget problems facing the games.

Of course no one should think that the cost overrun for the games will be "just" $110 million. That's today's estimate but the games are four years away and a full accounting may be an eternity from now. VANOC's John Furlong appeared to be trying out for the Olympic event of "back-patting" as he spun the cost overrun as an example of openness and transparency demonstrated by the unaccountable directors of his committee. Colin Hansen, Minister responsible for the games, did Furlong one better by emphasizing that the overrun easily fits in the contingency fund that is part of the $600 million budgeted by the Campbell government for the games.

If the Campbell government was truly sporting, it would introduce a really new expanded betting scheme based on accepting bets with respect to the total cost overrun at the conclusion of the games; a spin-off could be side bets on the overrun that will be announced just before the games begin. Punters could place their bets and the members of VANOC held personally responsible for paying the winner an amount equal to the overrun, or maybe that could be cost shared with the BC cabinet. Since BCLC appears to hate competition, as witnessed by the crackdown on pools in sports bars for the Super Bowl, it is unlikely that we'll see a government-sponsored betting scheme based on the eventual overrun, but our tax dollars are already on the line and we'll be paying for the enthusiasm shown when Campbell signed a blank cheque for the games. Unfortunately, there is no way for us to win on that game, but that's not far different from many of BCLC's schemes.

 

About Me | Mail Me | Navigation | Top
© 2006 David D. Schreck. All Rights Reserved.