Fiscal
year 2005/06 ends on March 31, 59 days from the date of
the announcement, yet $25 million is to be spent in that
time while that is the same amount that is allocated for
the full 12 month fiscal year 2006/07. The government should
be considerably more transparent and explain how $25 million
can be adequate for twelve months if that is what they plan
to spend in 59 days. The Health Authorities operate on the
same fiscal year as the government; they cannot carry surpluses
over between fiscal years. Or can they? Does the government
use different accounting rules for different situations?
A good news announcement shouldn't be ruined by a government
that refuses to be transparent about how money is spent
by health authorities.