September
28, 2005
International
Conventions for Children
"Extend
the non-partisanship reflected in the unanimous vote of
the Legislature endorsing the Convention by creating an
all-party committee of the Legislature to focus on child
and youth issues. Among other things, the Committee could
articulate British Columbia's plan of action, identify the
performance outcome measures and transparently report on
progress in relation to those measures, all in the context
of the Convention and with the support of the Child and
Youth Officer. "
Jane Morley, Child and Youth Officer, Issue
Paper No. 2, September 2005
BC's
Child and Youth Officer is busy with more than a special
investigation into a botched "kith & kin"
placement that resulted in the death of a 19 month old child
in 2002. Her website is being populated with articles and
issue papers.
Her
"Issue Paper No. 2" asked: "Can the principles
embedded in the international Convention
on the Rights of the Child (the Convention)
and Canada's national action plan, A
Canada Fit for Children, be used effectively as
a framework for a non-partisan, made-in-British Columbia
plan to guide the development and implementation of a unified,
cross-ministry, community-based approach to planning and
delivery of services for children, youth and families? "
Morley's
June 2005 special report titled "Healthy Early Childhood
Development in British Columbia: From Words to Action"
said that it highlighted "
the reflections arising
from the Healthy Child BC Forum held in November 2004, which
was attended by international experts on child health and
early childhood development, and practitioners and policy
makers from across British Columbia." However the report
distanced itself somewhat from the Forum
when it went on to say that "Child and Youth Officer's
recommendations, which are based not only on those reflections,
but also on numerous studies, plans and reports on the subject,
as well as on discussions with policy makers, service providers
and advocates."
Background
papers for the Forum went beyond the Convention on the
Rights of the Child and Canada's nation action plan.
One
paper pointed out that Canada has also ratified several
other international conventions: the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the
International
Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Morley focused on only two of the conventions while ignoring
others. Anyone comparing the 1966 Covenant of Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights brought into force in 1976
with the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child
brought into force in 1990, will see a stark difference.
The 1989 Convention speaks about rights to be free
from abuse and to have access to education, but it doesn't
go into the scope captured by the 1966 Covenant,
which said: "Children and young persons should be protected
from economic and social exploitation. Their employment
in work harmful to their morals or health or dangerous to
life or likely to hamper their normal development should
be punishable by law. States should also set age limits
below which the paid employment of child labour should be
prohibited and punishable by law." Recall that the
Campbell government recently amended Labour Standards so
as to permit children as young as 12 to work.
Whether
the scope is limited to the 1989 Convention or expanded
to include earlier Conventions, the Campbell government
would be well advised to heed Morley's suggestion and create
a Legislative committee to focus on child and youth issues.