The
case of the painted turtles at Grohman Narrows Provincial
Park should be carefully studied by Berry Penner, the new
Minister of the Environment. It involved a ministerial order
that was overturned by a judicial
review. The minister's decision would have allowed the
entrance to the park to be moved so that a developer would
not have to incur substantial costs to build an access road
on his property directly opposite the existing park access
road. The court found that the minister's decision benefited
the developer, and did not benefit the park.
Following
publicity over the case, Bill Barisoff, former Minister
of Water, Land and Air Protection, and now Speaker designate,
wrote to the Vancouver Province as well as community
papers defending his overturned decision. His letter indicated
that he appeared to have learned nothing from the judicial
review. He wrote: "The entrance to Grohman Narrows
Provincial Park and the property across the highway must
align in order to meet highway safety standards. When the
decision to move the park entrance was made, it was with
the understanding that the impacts to the turtles could
be mitigated, their habitat improved and an additional environmental
benefit to the local amphibian population could be gained,
all at no cost to the ministry." Those claims are contrary
to the court record which indicates that although the respondents
"
argue that this decision was made for the improvement,
development and use of the Park because it was made for
safety reasons. That argument was not supported by the Record.
Rather, there is nothing in the Record (or in the other
evidence for that matter) that disclosed that the present
Park entrance was inherently unsafe and that MOT would not
have required the Park entrance to move even if there had
been no development on the other side of the highway."
Evidence before the court also indicated that, contrary
to Barisoff's letter, the ministry would incur costs and
that the turtles' habitat would suffer.
Mitigation
means to make something less harsh or severe. The mitigating
measures proposed in the case of the painted turtles included
having a biologist present during road construction and
hoping that drainage conduits put under the road to maintain
water flow would be used by the turtles. The court found
that the proposed road would, "at the very least, disturb,
if not destroy or damage a portion of the land (including
the flora and fauna on it) in the Park." The court
was assisted by the submission into evidence of the Minister's
"Decision Note" which said "potential impacts
of moving the entrance of the park have been reviewed through
an impact assessment process and it has been determined
that ecological impacts related to the turtle nesting sites
in particular cannot be avoided but could be mitigated."
The public servant who made the note available was subsequently
fired only four hours before his scheduled retirement. The
government might soon add the embarrassment of losing his
appeal of that decision to their embarrassment of losing
the judicial review.
We can
hope that the Speaker designate will reflect on his errors
in judgment, including writing letters to the editor that
contradict the finding of the court.