April
21, 2005
Mischief
in Tourism Marketing
In
the first day or two of the official election campaign,
Gordon Campbell has demonstrated even less transparency
and openness than usual. Campbell is stumping the province
claiming that the NDP would cut the budget for tourism.
The media, obliged to report what people say rather than
the truth, repeat his fictions. Truth seekers can click
on the full 2005-2006 budget document as well as the estimates
for the Ministry of Small Business and Economic Development
which Campbell refused to allow to be called for legislative
debate.
The
2005-2006 budget documents contain one paragraph on tourism;
it states:
"Budget 2005 provides $67 million over the three
years for Tourism BC, building toward the objective of
doubling the tourism industry by 2015. This funding, combined
with revenues allocated from the provincial hotel room
tax, will allow Tourism BC to double its marketing budget
to $50 million. An additional $14 million is allocated
in 2004/05 for tourism initiatives to be announced at
a later date."
On
page 30 of the budget documents, the expansion of the
Vancouver Convention Centre is discussed. It says that
the province will provide : "$83 million of Tourism
Vancouver's $90 million funding commitment. The province
is contributing these funds to the project, and will be
reimbursed through Tourism Vancouver's own source revenues
over time."
The
Campbell government takes with one hand and gives with
another. It has required Tourism Vancouver to contribute
$90 million towards the Convention Centre out of revenues
that would otherwise go to tourism marketing.
The
estimates for the Ministry of Small Business and Economic
Development have a line item for "economic development
throughout British Columbia" that was $18.033 million
in 2004-05 and $236.762 million in 2005-06, hence it's
name as the election "slush fund". A footnote
to that line item states that the sub-vote includes implementing
the provincial tourism strategy. There is no other reference
to tourism in the Ministry's estimates; however, page
5 of the main budget documents reveal that the budget
for tourism marketing is to increase from $14 million
in 2004-05 to $24 million in 2005-06 before being cut
in each of the next two years. In other words, tourism
marketing was hidden in the $236.762 million election
slush fund, representing 10% of that fund in 2005-06.
What
does that tricky non-transparent accounting have to do
with the election? The NDP's platform said that $119 million
would be cut from the $237 million slush fund. The Campbell
Liberals spun that to claim that tourism marketing would
somehow be affected. On April 17th Carole
James responded saying: "Now that Premier Gordon
Campbell has finally come clean on what is covered by
his un-debated budget "slush fund," an analysis
shows that the NDP's platform can easily accommodate funding
for community sports venues and tourism." She went
on to point out that: "BC Liberal attacks on the
NDP platform have now been exposed as deliberate misinformation."
You would be hard pressed to find anything that reports
the size of the tourism budget, where it is hidden or
how much it represents of the slush fund. The misinformation
campaign will no doubt continue since news is about what
people say, not what is true.