In March
2003 the Campbell government passed the Forestry
Revitalization Act which confiscated tenure rights
of forest companies and removed their legal redress. It
limited all compensation to no more than $200 million; it
also established the BC Forestry Revitalization Trust, the
purpose of which is to mitigate the damages suffered by
eligible persons as "a result of restructuring of the
forestry sector and forestry operations within British Columbia,
arising out of reductions under the Forestry Revitalization
Act of harvesting rights available to licensees under
the Forest Act." In a manner typical of its
abuse of power, the Act was passed in a late night sitting
on March 31st.
If an
NDP government had attempted to remove the right of forest
companies to sue the government for the expropriation of
tenure rights, the lawns of the legislature would have been
packed with protestors. Friends of and major donors to the
Campbell government kept their mouths closed; however, legal
challenges might still arise after the next election is
safely behind us.
Legislation
by exhaustion was employed, notwithstanding the government's
enormous majority, in order to keep the costs arising from
the Act in the 2002-2003 fiscal year. Section 10(4)
of the Act states "In the 2002-2003 fiscal year
of the government, the minister must pay $75 million out
of the consolidated revenue fund to the BC Forestry Revitalization
Trust." During debate on Section 10, Forestry Minister
Mike de Jong confirmed that $47 million would be available
to displaced forest resource workers, $23 million to forestry
contractors and $5 million for administration of the Trust.
Minister
de Jong admitted during debate that pension bridging for
early retirement of displaced workers was estimated to cost
$150 million. His explanation for the shortfall between
that and the government's $47 million provided to the Trust
for displaced workers was that there would be "additional
moneys from other sources".
Friday,
January 21, the Campbell government announced that it would
provide a further $50 million to the Trust "to help
workers and contractors". It is a good thing that the
government is making up for part of the shortfall that was
identified in 2003, but its news
release did not acknowledge that it was correcting a
shortfall that was known when the Trust was established,
nor did the release say which of the "other sources"
failed to deliver. Maybe that's why the announcement was
made on a Friday, a day usually reserved for releasing bad
news so as to minimize coverage.
News
coverage has been skimpy on job loses in forestry. Data
from BC Stats and Statistics Canada's Labour Force Survey
show that average monthly employment in forestry dropped
by 22.4% in 2004. Employment in sawmills and paper and allied
manufacturing also fell by 10.4%. Between jobs in the woods
and forestry manufacturing jobs, average monthly employment
was 12,900 lower in 2004 than in 2003. As a result of the
restructuring of the forest industry, loss of tenure and
elimination of provisions that tie wood supply to communities,
those jobs may not come back even if the softwood dispute
is settled. Based on the $150 million estimate of the costs
for pension bridging that was made when the legislation
was introduced, it looks like Friday's $50 million top-up
may still fall short.