November
4, 2005
Falcon
Derailed
Too
long in power makes many governments become arrogant. The
Campbell government may have started out that way partly
as a result of its initial 77-2 majority and partly because
of the personal style of the Premier. Losing 30 seats in
the 2005 election should have been a humbling experience
that offered lessons, but Transportation Minister Kevin
Falcon, one of Campbell's closest allies, demonstrated in
question period on November 3rd that nothing has been learned.
The
Official Opposition focused its full half hour of questions
on Falcon over changes that have happened since CN purchased
BC Rail. Falcon alleged that previous governments politically
interfered in the railway system. NDP Leader Carole James
said: "I don't think we're talking about interference
here. We're talking about whether the minister and government
are going to stand up for citizens." Falcon doesn't
get it; instead of being advocates for their constituents,
he and his colleagues have turned into apologists for CN.
Their history in giving BC Rail to CN and accepting political
contributions from CN, makes it look all the worse for the
Campbell government.
Falcon
produced a letter sent by BC Rail to a landowner in 2000
asking for a share of the costs for upgrading a level crossing.
He attempted to generalize from that and argue that nothing
has changed after the sale to CN except for whether or not
the bills are collected. The NDP was prepared for that response;
Bob Simpson, MLA for Cariboo-North, said:
Falcon
took up the challenge and instead of accepting Simpson's
suggestion to contact all landowners who are having problems
with CN; he argued that the whole issue comes down to public
safety. Once again he missed the opportunity to be a champion
for citizens while sounding like the public relations flack
for CN. When the Campbell government negotiated the sale
to CN it protected itself against future costs and liability,
but it failed to protect ordinary citizens. It would have
been easy for government to include protection in the contract
with CN so that costs would not be shifted from the railway
to its neighbours. Having failed in that task, the government
could at least use its influence to get CN to back-off and
behave like a responsible corporate citizen. That's not
likely to happen given the cozy relationship that has been
demonstrated between CN and the government, and with the
attitude that was displayed by BC's Minister of Transportation.