June
22, 2005
Opposition
Critics
There
are big differences between appointing a cabinet and appointing
a "shadow cabinet". Cabinet ministers get an extra
$39,000 per year, a car, support staff and some power; even
lowly ministers of state get an extra $25,000 per year.
Those who miss the cut get nothing but make-work assignments
on caucus or legislative committees to keep them occupied
and out of trouble. Unlike opposition critics, government
backbenchers are rarely recognized by the media and almost
never interviewed, but like backbenchers opposition critics
get no extra pay or perks.
Some
columnists may attempt to paint divisions within the opposition
caucus that are equivalent to the cabinet-backbench divide
on the government side, but that is fiction. It is true
that some roles such as health, education and finance may
carry more prestige, but there is ample work and opportunity
for recognition for all members of the opposition. The role
of an opposition critic is to meet with those who want to
inform the opposition in the critic's topic area, work with
party policy committees, be available to the media for interviews
and debate the corresponding minister during budget "estimates
debate". Any hint of a first and second string team
won't be revealed until several weeks of question period
have passed. That is when we will see whether all members
are given time to ask questions or whether a "rat pack"
emerges that takes the lead in what's called "QP".
Once
critic responsibilities are assigned, members of the opposition
need to avoid "poaching". When asked a question
outside their scope as a critic, they should refer it to
the appropriate member of caucus rather than risk contradicting
what the official critic might say. Unlike an election campaign
where all candidates are expected to comment on all issues,
once the election is over and responsibilities are assigned,
it is diplomatic for both cabinet ministers and opposition
critics to confine their remarks to their official assignments.
With 20 full cabinet ministers and 3 ministers of state
compared to 33 opposition critics, the opposition can put
more effort and attention into select priorities assigning
every member some topic of responsibility; there is no opposition
backbench with little or no responsibility.
The
Liberals, and some media pundits, have focused on some members
of the NDP caucus and questioned whether they would receive
much of an assignment as critic because of their involvement
in past governments. In announcing the critic duties, Carole
James showed that she will not waste the experience and
talent of any member of her caucus. Adrian Dix was appointed
critic for the Ministry of Children and Family Development,
and Leonard Krog was appointed critic for the Attorney General.
The Campbell cabinet shuffle created the Ministry of Labour
and Citizen Services. Chuck Puchmayr, MLA for New Westminster,
was named Labour critic. Citizen services may be a sleeper.
It includes government agents, BC Stats, BC Online, BC Internet
Services, BC Bid, Enquiry BC and the Canada-BC Business
Service Centre and the Chief Information Officer. Harry
Lali was made critic for "Citizen Services". The
Campbell government has been busy privatizing or contracting
out much of government information technology functions.
There are rumours that by the end of summer government may
contract out or "outsource" more than 2,500 'servers'
that are used to store their day to day work or case files
throughout government, in other words, servers that hold
some of the most confidential information in government.
Lali may have his hands full if those rumours prove true.