The
title of Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General
doesn't begin to capture the wide range of responsibilities
held by Rich Coleman in the Campbell cabinet. In addition
to being responsible for the police
and corrections,
Coleman's reach includes gambling,
drunk
driving, the Superintendent
of motor vehicles, ICBC,
liquor
licensing, landlords
and tenants, consumer
protection, film
classification, the provincial
emergency program, the coroner's
service, including responsibility for review of child
and youth deaths, and victim
assistance. With the departure of Gary Collins, Christy
Clark and Geoff Plant, Coleman is arguably the most powerful
member of Campbell's cabinet. How has he been able to juggle
so many hot potatoes without getting burnt? It is certainly
not because there has been a lack of controversy.
A review
of how Coleman has handled question period provides some
insight into his successful grip on power. Using his large
frame, booming voice and assertive style, he forcefully
answered questions while hiding behind the independence
of statutory officers. For example, on February 21st, newly
elected MLA Jagrup Brar asked Coleman to call for an inquiry
into the tragic death of Baljit Bains, who died following
questionable treatment at Surrey Memorial Hospital. Coleman
invited the member to read the Coroner's Act and concluded
by saying: "
the coroner responsible for the file
will make the decision whether there should be an inquiry
or an inquest. Not until such time and at no time will I
interfere with that investigation." Further questions
were directed to the Minister of Health.
The
Campbell government fired the independent officers of the
legislature who used to investigate the deaths of children.
During the last week the legislature sat, the former officers
released a letter they had sent to the Premier regarding
the accountability of government for the deaths of children.
The Minister of Children and Family Development hid behind
the Children and Youth Officer, Jane Morley, and answered
all questions by reading her letter in which she expressed
confidence in social workers and said: "The letter
to the Premier laments the end of a number of accountability
mechanisms that previously resided with the organizations
that the former officials led. Each one of the mechanisms
listed remains within the authority of an independent statutory
officer (the Ombudsman, the Chief Coroner and the Child
and Youth Officer). The public need not be concerned on
that front." The Catch-22 is that Morley does not have
the authority to investigate deaths, the coroner does. If
a question is put to the Solicitor General regarding a coroner's
investigation, Coleman will answer as he did with respect
to the Surrey Hospital; read the Act, the coroner is independent.
In other words, there is no political accountability
and the public is kept in the dark.
When
the Liberals were in opposition they took every opportunity
to criticize the expansion of gambling, but in government
they doubled it. Coleman's response, as given in the legislature
on February 15th, was: "There were 22 casinos allowed
when we became government. There are 18 today." Anyone
who has visited the massive Reno style casinos, which operate
24-7, that have opened under the Campbell government know
that a campaign promise has been broken. Coleman's response,
when pushed, is to hide behind the "independent"
BC Lotteries Corporation, and to say that they are free
to expand to the extent the market allows. The third parties,
municipalities and community advocates, who would never
have let the NDP get away with such weak answers, have been
strangely silent as of late.
The
public consultation period for a review of drunk driving
ended on August 31, 2003. On October 10, 2004, when speaking
on Bill 66, Joy MacPhail challenged Coleman over concerns
raised by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) over a report
which "
showed that only 11 percent of hospitalized
drivers whose blood showed they were legally impaired were
later convicted of drunk driving offences. Of a total of
1,697 drivers who were hospitalized, 619 were impaired,
with an average blood alcohol level more than twice the
legal limit." Instead of dealing with the unsatisfactory
Criminal Code conviction rate, the Campbell government increased
alternatives under the Motor Vehicle Act. When asked about
drunk driving, Coleman now cites statistics on the number
of 24 hour suspensions. A cynic might think their initiatives
were primarily related to reducing court costs, but what
can you do in a province where the popularity of the Premier
increased after his drunk driving episode?
A review
of Coleman's record in legislative debate shows that he
is well versed on his files. At least part of the answer
to how he has been able to juggle so many hot potatoes without
getting burnt has to be the size of the opposition. It takes
a lot of research and work to be an effective critic of
a Ministry that is as large as the Ministry of Public Safety
and the Solicitor General. On May 17th voters will determine
whether the NDP should be given a chance at government or
whether they should form a larger opposition. One way or
the other, more New Democrats will contribute to better
government.