On Canada
Day Community Living British Columbia will assume full responsibility
for community living services previously delivered by the
Ministry of Children and Family Development. When the Campbell
government came to power the budget for those services was
$664 million, by fiscal
year 2004-05 it had been cut to $610 million even though
the number of disabled requiring services increased to over
15,000. In its February 2005 service plan the Ministry re-stated
its budget estimates, changing community living to "adult
community living services". That was not the first
time the Ministry switched terms. Those who didn't save
the July 2001 ministry budget estimates which used the term
"community living" won't find the documents on
the government website. In their place are doucments which
use for 2001-02, adult community living, before switching
back to community living for 2002-03. StrategicThoughts
has provided the historical budget page for readers who
click here.
The
2005 switch to adult community living services changed the
$610 million community living services budget for 2004-05
to $494 million for adults, projected to increase to $542
million in fiscal year 2007-08; however, the new authority's
2005
business plan states that: "The budget supporting
field operations totals $599,184,000 and includes staffing
and all contracted service costs for individuals and for
families with special needs children. The budget for headquarters,
centrally provided services and board functions is $8,300,000."
The new authority is looking at a budget of over $607 million,
not the lower "adult" figure. The change in terminology
in the ministry's budget may be an attempt to prevent comparisons
to previous years by not reporting on the budget for services
to children. That might be the first of many moves that
will make substantial public spending and critically important
services less open to public and legislative scrutiny.
On July
1st the new authority will assume legal responsibility for
almost a third of the Ministry of Children and Family Development.
It has been a rocky
transition that is still not acceptable to all members
of the community, involving many delays and the Walls investigation.
The Minister, Stan Hagen, has the authority to set standards,
hire and fire the board and to demand that any document
he requires be produced. In many respects the handing off
of some authority to a community board is similar to what
the Dave Barrett government attempted to do with community
resource boards in the 1970s. The big difference this time
is that the transfer occurred at the same time as budget
cuts. Many members of the very active community living family
feel that they will have fewer services while bearing full
responsibility for the consequences of allocating a reduced
budget. If Hagen attempts to refer questions during legislative
debate to his appointed board, he will have to be reminded
of the considerable powers he possesses under the Community
Living Authority Act. Sometime after the legislature
is called to order in September Hagen will have to defend
his ministry's budget, "his estimates". Perhaps
he should invite the chief executive officer of the new
authority to be present during those estimate debates.
June
29, 2005
Revisionists
and the Budget Estimates
The
following page was copied from the ministry budget estimates
tabled in the legislature in the July 2001 mini-budget
after the Campbell government changed the name of the
Ministry of Children and Families to the Ministry of Children
and Family Development. Notice that it shows "community
living" budgeted for $663.909 million (round to $664
million) for fiscal year 2001-02. References in budget
documents or service
plans for 2001-02 on the government website now refer
to "adult community living services" although
in
2002-03 that reference was dropped and changed back
to "community living services". The original
ministry budget estimates for 2001-02 as presented in
July 2001 are no longer on the government
website. It appears that the government has made it
as difficult as possible to trace the record on its cuts
to community living. Students of government policy need
to save documents when they appear since they might disappear
or be revised when it is politically convenient or when
history is manipulated.
