June
2, 2005
Vancouver-Burrard
and Caucus Politics
Who
is the winner in Vancouver-Burrard? After the "final
count" BC Liberal Lorne Mayencourt emerged 18 votes
ahead of the NDP's Tim Stevenson. The close race triggers
an automatic judicial recount. It could switch either way
when that is done, but it would be unusual for a judicial
recount to change the outcome. So what difference does the
close race mean?
It had
to be tough for Stevenson who would have already participated
in two or three NDP caucus meetings in preparation for the
next legislative session. However, backed by Vancouver Mayor
Larry Campbell, Stevenson remains a city counselor who could
win another term in the November municipal election.
In the
greater scheme of provincial politics it would not appear
that changing the outcome from 34-45 to 33-46 means much,
but consider the personalities. Stevenson went public against
Glen Clark when his government was expanding gambling only
to end up casting a deciding vote as a city councilor to
allow slots in Vancouver. Mayencourt is infamous for his
"safe streets" legislation which rewards beggars
with $85 tickets. His "incident" with a street
person is still in the hands of a special
prosecutor. Imagine Mayencourt in the same caucus with
Wally Oppal. It could do more damage to the Campbell Liberals
to have Mayencourt in caucus than it would do to have Stevenson
in opposition.
If,
after a mandatory judicial recount Mayencourt remains the
victor, the balance in the legislature will be 33-46. If
Campbell continues with a cabinet of 28, after appointing
the Speaker (nominally there's an "election"),
the government backbench would number only 16. That could
be difficult as the 16 may consider themselves as well or
better qualified as the 28. From the backbench, Mayencourt
might challenge the new Attorney General's views on civil
liberties. Tensions between members of a smaller caucus,
and conflicting personalities, are a much larger problem
than anything Campbell experienced when he enjoyed a majority
of 77-2.