October
14, 2005
BCTF
in Virtual Trusteeship
If The
Honourable Madam Justice B. Brown ever retires from the
bench, she should consider teaching university courses in
lateral thinking. Her
ruling on the contempt of court charge against the BC
Teachers' Federation stumped the pundits and was described
in glowing terms. She essentially put the teachers' union
into trusteeship while reserving the right to levy further
heavy penalties. Her explicit reference to denying the $50
per day strike pay infuriated the rank-and-file teachers
and might contribute to renewing their resolve to remain
on the picket line several more days at the risk of enormous
fines for the union.
A broad
interpretation of the court's order means the union is in
trusteeship with the court appointed "monitor".
The union, in that interpretation, cannot use its email
systems, its phone systems, its faxes or even its offices
to in any way further strike action. Doing so would aggravate
the contempt and run the risk of bankrupting the union with
fines.
The
court's
decision said:
"I
will enjoin the BCTF and related entities (and here I am
contemplating wholly-owned subsidiaries, trusts, etc, because
I do not understand or know the exact mechanism that the
BCTF is using to facilitate the breach of the court order,
it appears that there may be funds solely in control of
the BCTF) and from using their assets to further the breach
of the court order of October 6, 2005."
"In
particular, the BCTF is enjoined from paying amounts to
its members as "strike pay" or to otherwise compensate
members for loss relating to breach of the order of October
6, 2005; from providing guarantees or promises to pay to
protect members from such losses; from using its books records
and offices to permit third parties to facilitate continuing
breach of the court order."
It took
a lot to drive law abiding teachers to participate in the
longest province-wide strike in BC's history. Large classes
with unlimited numbers of special needs students is a daily
reality that is not the same for trustees, administrators
or parent advisory groups as it is for classroom teachers.
Anger over those learning and working conditions, resulting
from the Campbell government's 2002 Bill 28, drove the "illegal
strike". Many teachers were insulted with the suggestion
that they have been on picket lines because of the incentive
of $50 a day in strike pay.
The
behaviour of the Campbell government during the dispute
has been despicable. The Premier spoke live from Toronto
on Global TV shortly after the court decision was announced.
When asked what he would say to teachers he spoke in the
third person about what "they" might think or
do. He missed the opportunity to look them in the eye and
ask for a fresh start. That's no surprise since his Minister
of Labour took the lead in teacher bashing the first week
of the strike; instead of acting as a neutral party in an
attempt to find a solution. When the media found a dozen
or so teachers, out of 40,000, who crossed the picket line
Education Minister Shirley Bond crept out of her hiding
place and proclaimed that the government would stand behind
teachers who stood up to their union.
Unions
have an obligation under their constitution and by-laws
to deal with complaints by one member against another, but
it is highly unlikely that any union would punish a member
for crossing the line under the circumstances facing the
BCTF. However, it is also unlikely that any such member
would find themselves anything but ostracized by their colleagues;
the staff room is likely to be a very cold place for some
teachers.
The
dispute between BC's teachers and the Campbell government
has not been helped by the court's decision or by the behaviour
of the Premier, the Minister of Labour or the Minster of
Education. However it ends the bitterness is likely to continue
for a long time to come, much to the detriment of everyone
involved.
A key
to exercising power is to know its limitations. The extremely
arrogant Campbell government has repeatedly demonstrated
that is doesn't understand its limitations. At a time when
the courts are on the verge of bankrupting the union that
has already been placed into virtual trusteeship, the Campbell
government could defuse the conflict for the sake of education
by offering some small compromise. A government that knows
how to exercise power would create a "face saving"
alternative for both parties.