Strategic Thoughts

bannerspacerAbout Me | Mail Me | Linksbannerspacer2

July 12, 2005

Questions for Stan Hagen and Community Living BC

On Friday, July 8th, Community Living British Columbia (CLBC) posted four notices of intent to contract to the BC Bid® website. "Intent to contract" means that the agency will proceed without bids unless an alternative supplier can successfully object. The four contracts represent $407,800 to be spent on IT (information technology) between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2005. The contracts also permit billing for "allowable expenses" and three of the contracts include an option to renew based on satisfactory performance. The four notices of intent all state: "This is a continuation of a development effort that has been underway for some time and is based on the contractor's participation to date." That means money was spent prior to this $407,800 and more will be spent after December 31st. Awarding contracts on a piecemeal basis without bids is not the best purchasing policy.

The Doug Walls scandal that hit the Interim Community Living Authority included contracts for information technology services with CareNet Technology Society. According to the PricewaterhouseCoopers' audit into Walls and CareNet, the CareNet project cost $3,776,848. The auditor was not able to obtain access to CareNet's records as the Society was in bankruptcy and the trustee would not permit access as there was no legal authority to require it. No one is suggesting any irregularities with respect to the current contracts, but the public has a right to know how much is being spent on the entire IT project, how much of that duplicates work that was previously paid for but not necessarily delivered when the Interim Authority and its predecessors were responsible and whether contracting procedures recommended by the auditor are currently being adhered to.

On July 8th the Ministry of Children and Family Development also posted a notice of intent to contract: "Notice is hereby given by the Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) of its intent to direct award a contract to Enterprise Project Management Ltd. to provide project management facilitation, co-ordination and administration for projects to support the implementation of the MOU/Children's Agreement." According to the notice, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was entered into between the Ministry and CLBC "to maintain continuity for families." The term of the MOU is July 1, 2005 through June 2006, but the $30,000 contract for "project management facilitation", plus allowable expenses, is for a term of "July 18 to September 30, 2005, with an option to renew based on satisfactory performance." At that rate, if it were necessary to renew the contract until the end of the MOU, it could cost a further $108,000. CLBC's website does not provide access to the detailed MOU which was signed between the Ministry's Deputy Minister and the Interim Authority's interim chief executive officer, but it provides access to a more general "Letter of Expectations" dated July 1, 2005, and signed by Minister Stan Hagen and CLBC Chair Lois Hollstedt. Hagen and Hollstedt need to tell the public why it takes a consultant at a cost of about $3,000 per week to manage that agreement. Isn't that what the CLBC staff are being paid to do?

Government procurement policies are available on the Ministry of Finance website. CLBC is just one week old and it already seems to be having difficulty with those policies. Finance Minister Carole Taylor, as well as Hagen, may be held to account for postings to the BC Bid® website that may stretch the spirit, if not the letter, of procurement policies.

 

About Me | Mail Me | Navigation | Top
© 2005 David D. Schreck. All Rights Reserved.