April
2, 2004
No
Morality in How Work is Valued
In our
economy a pornographer can make a good living while social
workers who deal with victimized children get laid off and
categorized as unnecessary government overhead. This illustrates
how we make judgments about the value of work. How the economy
determines value has little or nothing to do with morality,
and everything to do with supply and demand. The need for
social workers comes from social ills, but the number of social
workers employed comes from policy decisions made by government.
The Campbell
government has campaigned viciously against hospital workers,
and its health authorities systematically drive down wages
and working conditions through contracting out. They get away
with that not only because they have the power, but because
they think they have public support. It is another example
of government determining demand in a labour market, and in
this case, also interfering on the supply side.
When first
elected, and just before hiring the former BC Liberal party
president as a deputy minister, the Premier said that government
had to pay top dollar in order to attract the best and the
brightest. Resentment of decently paid hospital workers can
come from those who are highly paid and unable to understand
what it is like to barely scrape by. It can also come from
those who are envious of workers who make more. The "politics
of envy" is a term used to describe how some people resent
what other people have. A person making $10.00 an hour is
living in poverty and paying taxes to support workers making
$18.00 an hour. If they are doing substantially the same work,
the bitterness created is far more dangerous for unionized
workers than any pressure coming from the six figure set.
Organizing
the unorganized so as to improve the pay and working conditions
of low paid workers, may be the most effective strategy for
protecting rights that have been won. There are more low income
than high income people; political support, or at least the
apathy of low income workers, is necessary for government
to retain power.
Many of
our living standards are taken for granted. The eight hour
day, weekends off and living wages didn't happen by accident.
Like many of our social programs, from Medicare to pensions,
they were hard fought for. Today our standards are being attacked
and eroded. Defending the gains of the past may well depend
on fighting for those who have been passed over and remain
the working poor. Their support must not be won by those who
would drive more into their ranks.
|