February
10, 2004
Throne
Speech in background of Scandal
The 2004
BC Throne Speech was delivered in an atmosphere of controversy
and scandal:
It is
getting to the point where it is necessary to have a program
in order to keep the scandals straight. Government may find
it difficult to regain control of the agenda with so many
balls in the air. The Throne Speech, delivered exactly 1,000
days since the last election, sounded like a rehash of dozens
of staged cabinet meetings and tired news releases. The two
new items in the speech are unlikely to be sufficient to distract
attention from the scandals that plague the Campbell government.
The first
new item in the speech was an announcement that funding will
be increased for advanced education after the next election!
It is hard to believe, but the major announcement on advanced
education was a promise to add 25,000 new student spaces to
B.C.'s colleges, universities and institutes by 2010 and to
increase the advanced education budget by $105 million by
2006-07 - the election date is May 17, 2005. The 2002-03 budget
for advanced education was $1.899 billion; the service plan
indicated it would be frozen in 2004-05. An increase of $105
million in 2006-07 would be an increase of 5.5% after three
years of frozen budgets. That is less than the increase in
the cost of living over the three years.
The second
new item in the speech was an announcement that the government
would backtrack on yet another failed experiment. The speech
stated that government will "
reinstate funding
to maintain forest recreation roads and recreation sites".
They finally came to their senses and realized that closing
the forest roads was harming tourism.
The speech,
written in the Premier's Office, said "Our unemployment
rate has dropped to its lowest level in years and is now below
the national rate." Not so fast Mr. Premier; according
to Statistics Canada the seasonally adjusted unemployment
rate in January was 7.4% for Canada and 7.3% for BC. The unadjusted
rate was 7.9% for Canada and 8.0% for BC. In May 2001, at
the time of the last election, the seasonally adjusted rate
was 7.0% for Canada and 6.8% for BC; the unadjusted rate was
7.1% for Canada and 6.7% for BC. Following the election BC's
seasonally adjusted unemployment rate reached a high of 9.4%
in May 2002. Maybe "lowest in years" means lower
than it was a year and a half ago, but it is still not lower
than it was in May 2001. No one should be pleased with over
160,000 people unemployed in BC in January 2004; in May 2001
there were 144,100 unemployed.
During
the usual routine motions following the Throne Speech, Opposition
House Leader Joy MacPhail moved a motion to establish an "Attorney
General-Solicitor General Joint Committee" to look at
how to fight organized crime. MacPhail said:
"I
want to make it clear that the intent of this committee
would not be to examine organized crime's links to this
government. Indeed, that is the subject of a police investigation.
Rather, the intent perhaps can best be understood as our
way of helping the Solicitor General keep his unfulfilled
promise to hold a public forum on organized crime, a forum
he said would involve the judiciary, the Crown prosecutors,
police and the public to examine fully how we can do a better
job fighting organized crime. The Solicitor General will
recall that he made that promise in March of last year at
the Premier's annual congress."
"At
the time, the opposition fully supported this initiative,
but we have been disappointed in his failure to follow through.
Therefore, we bring this motion forward, a motion that is
in keeping with the new-era promise to give all MLAs and
citizens a better voice in government through active legislative
committees."
House
Leader Gary Collins signaled to his troops that he would have
nothing of MacPhail's motion so it went down to the usual
overwhelming defeat.
MacPhail
gave notice to the Speaker that she reserved her right to
raise a matter of privilege on three separate issues. It looks
like the days ahead will be interesting in BC's legislature,
although not necessarily very pleasant for the Campbell government.
|