|
On
Tuesday, June 29, BC's
Public Accounts became available for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2004. They include the audited financial statements
that are one of the most important disclosure documents for
government. They were accompanied by political
spin from Finance Minister Gary Collins which the Vancouver
Sun carried the next day as a headline story without critical
analysis. What is buried in the public accounts is evidence
that the Campbell tax cuts failed to pay for themselves, and
a tax grab of $903 million was made through tobacco, fuel
and property purchases taxes. That is in addition to $400
million per year that was raised through the increase in MSP
premiums. That's not an economic success story. That is a
lesson in shifting taxes from one source to another.
The public
accounts make it possible to compare actual outcomes with
initial government plans. Collins presented his first full
budget to the legislature in February 2002. That was after
a mini-budget in July 2001 where he added to the $1.5 billion
per year in personal income tax cuts by announcing corporate
tax cuts that were projected to total $790 million per year
by fiscal 2003-04. In his first full year budget, Collins
included, as he is required to do, the
plan for the next two fiscal years. In February 2002 his
plan for fiscal year 2003-04 was to raise $13.062 billion
in tax revenue. The public accounts just released show that
$13.808 billion was raised in tax revenue. Where did the unexpected
$746 million come from? Is this evidence that the tax cuts
paid for themselves?
The original
plan for 2003-04 projected personal income tax revenues of
$5.159 billion for 2003-04; the audited statements show they
came in at $4.878 billion - a shortfall of $281 million. The
original plan projected corporate income tax revenues of $793
million; the audited statements show they came in at $776
million - a shortfall of $17 million. The original plan projected
sales tax revenues of $3.982 billion; the audited statements
show they came in at $4.001 billion - $19 million more than
expected. The original plan projected property tax revenues
of $1.454 billion; the audited statements show they came in
at $1.576 billion - $122 million more than expected. Totaling
the difference between the plan and the audited statement
for personal income tax, corporate income tax, sales tax and
property tax shows a shortfall of $157 million. That means
that that total tax revenues not only came in $746 million
higher than what was planned, but that the remaining taxes
also had to cover the $157 million shortfall in the highest
yielding taxes.
The audited
financial statements show tax revenue from the other taxes
as $2.577 billion. The original plan called for $1.674 billion.
The difference of $903 million accounts for the increase in
total tax revenue. That increase came from fuel taxes, tobacco
taxes and property purchase taxes. Instead of having the tax
cuts pay for themselves, they were offset by gouging on other
forms of taxation.
|