The
party that promised not to sell BC Rail, not to expand gambling
and not to create chaos in the Ministry of Children and
Family Development is at its promise game again. At least
one promise, increasing benefits for people with disabilities,
is being implemented December 22nd. Other promises are a
little fuzzy with respect to both implementation date and
details.
It is
hard not to think of Campbell's promises as "election
goodies", motivated by the need to buy votes. Nevertheless,
the government deserves some credit for finally increasing
the monthly allowance received by people with disabilities.
Advocates for people with disabilities are concerned how
the $70 increase per month will be structured. Payments
consist of a living allowance and a shelter portion. Recipients
are guaranteed the living allowance, but the shelter portion
depends on the actual cost. The concern is that any increase
in the shelter portion will be a signal to landlords for
rent increases. Alternatively, anyone who isn't already
using the maximum shelter allowance would not receive the
full $70 if it is applied to the shelter portion of the
cheque. For a single person, the $70 is an increase of 8.9%.
Of course, that comes after more than several years of no
adjustments. The consumer price index for BC rose by 8.9%
between July 1999 and September 2004. The increase for families
with one disabled parent is no greater; for a one parent
family with two children, the $70 is an increase of 6.0%
(the amount inflation has increased since February 2001).
In September
2004 there were 3,651 single parent families receiving
disability assistance.
The
government's news
release says that the rate increase for persons with
disabilities is expected to benefit 66,500 clients in 2005-06.
In September 2004 there were 53,586 disability assistance
cases which involved 65,211 people (clients). The Ministry
appears to be forecasting a 2% increase in the caseload.
Although the government was criticized for a mean-spirited
"review" of disability assistance that cost millions,
while achieving little other than increased anxiety, the
total caseload has increased by almost 24% since June 2001.
A 2% increase in the caseload is not consistent with recent
growth of more than 6% per year unless government has a
secret plan to make it more difficult to apply for disability
assistance.
At their
Whistler convention, Premier Campbell also announced a 15
year plan for making BC's schools earthquake safe. It would
help Campbell's credibility if a plan could be released
saying when each school will receive seismic upgrading.
That would mean telling a lot of parents that their children
will have graduated before their school is considered. Everyone
can remember the broken promise of 5,000 new long term care
beds that turned into the closure of residential care beds
so as to fund assisted living (where a person might get
a bath once a week). Promises that are short on details
and vague on timelines are worth little.
Who
can question the Whistler convention promise to provide,
over the next four years, a comprehensive diagnostic program
for children under the age of six that will provide testing
and support for hearing screening, sight testing and dental
checks. Perhaps Campbell forgot that when he eliminated
coverage for eye exams in November 2002, he exempted children
and seniors. He should also visit the Ministry of Health's
website where it provides a fact
sheet on hearing. The Ministry has been encouraging
parents to have their children tested by an audiologist
if they suspect their child has a hearing problem. It concludes
"For more information on hearing loss in infants and
toddlers, please contact your local public health unit or
family doctor, or call the 24-hour BC NurseLine to speak
to a registered nurse." It looks like Campbell's diagnostic
program is a new effort to provide dental exams combined
with repackaging existing eye and ear exams, but we'll have
to wait (maybe four years) to learn what is really intended.
With
a record of broken campaign promises, Campbell stands on
the edge of a major credibility gap going into the next
election. Promises, and even an extraordinary pre-budget
sales tax cut, did not help him in the Surrey-Panorama Ridge
by-election. He may have nowhere to turn for help.