September
8, 2004
Politics
of Transportation
For
those who like nice round numbers, Thursday, September 9,
2004, is exactly 250 days from the next general election in
BC. It is probably not a simple love of numbers that leads
the Campbell government to phrase many of its announcements
with reference to 2010. A two week sporting event will come
and go, but it must not distort planning priorities for decades
to come.
The latest
example of distorting priorities, while playing politics for
the upcoming Surrey - Panorama Ridge by-election, is Kevin
Falcon's claim that the Port Mann will be twinned, highway
1 will be made 8 lanes to Langley, and highway 10 will be
substantially upgraded, all by 2010. The projects, known as
the Gateway Program, have been on the drawing boards for the
Ministry of Transportation and the GVRD for well over a decade.
What's missing is how the required expenditures fit into planning
for transportation requirements in the rest of the province,
and how the highway improvements will be balanced with transit
so as not to simply make a bigger and more polluting parking
lot.
On the
Rafe Mair show, Mary Polak, Liberal candidate in the by-election,
claimed that the cars are already there which demonstrates
the need for the expanded highways. "Build it and they
will come" is nowhere truer than when applied to road
construction. Does it make sense to correctly oppose Sumas
II and then replace it with additional tens of thousands of
polluting vehicles? Part of the GVRD's "Livable
Region Strategic Plan", adopted in 1996, is based
on moderating traffic demand by reducing car use. The provincial
government should not destroy years of planning for livable
town centres by fast tracking service for automobiles. Campbell
and Falcon may be upset that they had to brow beat TransLink
in order to get it to distort its priorities and put an airport
RAV line ahead of the northeast sector, but they shouldn't
compound their error by ignoring the GVRD in highway construction.
The Port Mann will eventually be twinned but when it is, it
should be part of an integrated transportation plan.
The provincial
transportation plan (see http://www.bcbudget.gov.bc.ca/sp2004/trans/trans.pdf)
says twinning the Port Mann bridge "and widening 33 km
of the Trans-Canada Highway is one of three major projects
the province is considering through new partnerships, given
support from TransLink, local communities, industry and the
public." The plan suggests that the 3.5 cents per litre
motor fuel tax that was implemented on March 1, 2003, is not
sufficient to finance transportation requirements throughout
the province. "New partnerships" is code language
for yet another public-private partnership, but the Campbell
government has failed in every attempt to implement its blind
faith that the private sector will come to its rescue. The
Ministry's "service plan" says "The Ministry
of Transportation is currently working with the Greater Vancouver
Transportation Authority (GVTA) and municipalities to assess
the existing highway network, review traffic forecasts and
develop the scope of each potential project. Preliminary estimates
suggest that the infrastructure investment would be in the
range of $3 billion. Detailed consultation with local governments,
communities and road users will begin in 2004." What
kind of consultation is it for Transportation Minister Kevin
Falcon to take a helicopter trip over the area, and then announce
that the Gateway Projects will be completed by 2010?
|