September
15, 2004
Uneven
Economic Growth
As
Finance Minister Gary Collins makes his round of talk shows
promoting the First Quarterly Report, he is claiming that
BC is experiencing "broad based" economic recovery.
There are a lot of people who would disagree with that, but
rather than rely on anecdotal evidence, we can turn to employment
data by industry from Statistics Canada's Labour Force Survey.
Since
May 2001 employment has fallen by 26,000 in "education
services"; it has fallen by 9,000 in "trade";
employment is down by 2,200 in the combined resource industries
of "forestry, fishing, mining, oil and gas". The
Campbell government would no doubt argue that one needs to
look at the recent picture rather than at the record of the
past three and a half years. When August 2004 is compared
to August 2003, employment is down by 9,800 in education,
down by 17,500 in trade, down by 6,000 in the resource industries,
and down by 5,400 in manufacturing.
BC's economy
has some hot spots and some very cold spots. Construction,
driven by low interest rates, is booming. Tourism has made
some recovery as shown by employment gains in "accommodation
and food services". Although the service sector accounts
for almost 80% of total employment, it has accounted for less
than 50% of the job growth, both in the last twelve months
and in the last three and a half years. Construction alone
accounts for three quarters of the total job gain since August
2003. That is not broad based growth.
Compounding
the uneven economic growth by industry are regional disparities.
Small communities in BC's Interior are hurting. The Campbell
government's forestry policy that ends the practice of tying
fibre supply to specific mills raises the specter of more
ghost towns.
Collins
is doing his best to spin a myth that BC's expected surplus
is due to a robust economy. When asked about his tax hikes
and service cuts, he responds with jargon about the need to
put our fiscal house in order. Those who are paying $1,000
a year more in MSP premiums have every right to think that
their payments created the surplus. Those who are looking
at higher heating bills are unlikely to think it's great that
the government is getting a windfall profit from higher natural
gas prices. No amount of political spin will hide the fact
that the expected surplus is due to tax hikes, service cuts
and high natural resource prices. The Campbell government
may get a few cheers from the six figure set who reaped the
big tax payoff, but most British Columbians have a sense that
the gains and the pains were not fairly distributed.
|