January
31, 2004
Battle
with the Docs
"In
a hospital, an entire group of physicians or an entire department
must not completely withdraw services. A physician must
be available to provide for the care of seriously ill or
emergency patients. Just as individual physicians cannot
abandon their patients, groups of physicians cannot abandon
their community."
Guidelines
Regarding Withdrawal of Physician Services, College
of Physicians & Surgeons of British Columbia, adopted
May 28, 2002
Health
Services Minister Colin Hansen is right to describe the mass
resignation of emergency room doctors from the Nanaimo
Regional General Hospital as unprofessional. Nurses would
never do anything like that, but if they did, they would be
subject to heavy fines and even jail. The question for Hansen
is, what is he going to do about it?
The College
of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia has issued
several letters to physicians over the past several years
cautioning them about service withdrawals. In May 2002 it
adopted a policy statement on the issue that clearly says
that entire departments cannot withdraw their services. Notwithstanding
its policy, the College appears to be standing by and waiting
for a disaster to occur in Nanaimo.
Alarmed
over the passive role of the College, the Campbell government
moved to implement recommendations to change the Health Professions
Act so that the College could essentially be put in trusteeship
if it failed in its responsibilities. When the doctors fought
back, the government caved and abandoned its legislation.
In the absence of a regulatory body that is prepared to enforce
its ethical standards, Hansen must come up with something
to protect the public. He would be well advised to cool his
rhetoric and agree to binding arbitration. Of course, he might
have a credibility problem since his government introduced
legislation to overturn the last binding arbitration with
BC's doctors.
The kind
of regional "wild-cat" job action that is taking
place is Nanaimo is no different from what various groups
of doctors used throughout the province in recent years. In
any other industry the tactic would be seen as failure to
honour an agreement, but the BC Medical Association gets away
with escalating demands while turning a blind eye to strike
activities - that is what is usually called bad faith bargaining.
When that happened under the former government, then Opposition
Leader Gordon Campbell and his caucus responded by encouraging
the physicians. Collin Hansen was Opposition Health Critic
on September 17, 2000, when he said:
"This
isn't about a head-butting exercise between the Minister
of Health and doctors in this province, but that's what
we've seen. In the middle of this we have patients. We have
individual citizens who live in Prince Rupert, Smithers,
Kitimat, Terrace. You can go across all 12 communities that
now have withdrawal of services by doctors. While this head-butting
exercise is going on between the minister and the doctors,
it's the patients in those communities that are paying the
price."'
"The
reason that those communities have solid support for their
doctors is because they recognize that what the doctors
are doing is standing up for long-term stability in the
delivery of health care in those regions. They realize that
if they don't stop the bleeding now in terms of doctors
that are leaving the province and doctors that are not coming
to the province in the first place, then those communities
are going to be in big trouble."
Hansen
went on to ask the Minister what the plan was if the government's
offer was rejected by the doctors. The same question can be
put to Hansen today. The New Democratic government accepted
the advice given by the Hon. Emmett M. Hall, one of the chief
architects of Medicare, in his second Royal Commission Report.
In 1980 he wrote "My conclusion and recommendation is
that when negotiations fail and an impasse occurs, the issues
in dispute must be sent to binding arbitration
"
One of the first acts of the Campbell government was to use
legislation to reject the arbitrated settlement between the
BCMA and the government. That exercise in contract breaking
created the instability and conflict that is unfolding in
Nanaimo and that is about to be unleashed throughout the province.
The Campbell
government
appointed Don Wright to review and recommend changes to
the collective bargaining structure for teachers in B.C. The
bargaining structure for physicians in B.C. is even less functional.
The government must either return to binding arbitration or
find an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that is acceptable
to all parties. The mechanism that Campbell and his ministers
appear to have adopted is propaganda waged through paid TV
advertisements and trial balloons. Gary Collins suggested
that the sales tax and MSP premiums would have to be further
increased if the doctors receive any award. Notice how he
carefully stuck with his favorite regressive taxes rather
than mentioning income tax surcharges for the six figure set.
No amount of effort to persuade or threaten the public will
resolve the dispute. The BCMA's
website is almost entirely restricted to physician access
only; little or no effort is made to communicate with the
public. A settlement requires a dispute settlement mechanism
like binding arbitration, not a war of words in a battle for
public opinion.
|