June
24, 2004
Green
Dilemma
The
Green Party is unlikely to win any seat on June 28th but they
have been encouraging potential voters with their excitement
over the new proportional
funding formula . The formula provides public financing
for any party that gets at least 2% of the total national
vote and at least 5% of the votes in constituencies for which
a payment of $1.75 per year per vote will be made to the national
party. However, Stephen Harper may dash those hopes.
According
to the Conservative
platform, a Harper government would "End corporate
and union political donations, and end forced taxpayer subsidies
of political parties." That could mean both the elimination
of tax deductions for donations and the elimination of the
new public financing formula.
The Greens
are in an awkward position. Two of their most cherished policies,
proportional representation and public financing of political
parties, are more likely to succeed if they vote NDP. Jack
Layton has made it clear that he would demand a national referendum
within a year on the implementation of proportional representation.
Green supporters would be wise to vote NDP if they want to
see those policies implemented, and environmentalists would
certainly be wise to vote NDP since it earned the highest
marks on the Sierra
Club of Canada's federal party report card.
|