June
29, 2004
Lessons
from Election 2004
The
CBC
quoted Gordon Campbell and Gary Collins as downplaying
NDP gains in Monday's election. Perhaps they should listen
to John Reynolds who was quoted on CBC radio the morning after
the election saying that the Campbell Liberals need to be
worried about the results. Throughout the campaign David Anderson
expressed concern that the Liberals would lose votes as the
result of anger directed at Campbell. It is not just Jack
Layton who reminded voters that the Campbell style would not
be good for Canada.
Campbell
could have chosen to be gracious and simply congratulated
everyone who participated in all campaigns, and particularly
those who will be returning to Ottawa as MPs. There doesn't
appear to be a gracious bone in Campbell's body. In saying
that "three out of four British Columbians aren't responding
to the NDP's message", he missed the opportunity to send
a message that he is listening to concerns regarding his government.
The NDP's federal vote is always smaller than the NDP's provincial
vote. In the 2001 provincial election the NDP received only
343,156 votes. On Monday in BC the NDP received 458,377 federal
votes (compared to 182,993 in the 2000 federal election).
The party's election machinery got a good oiling, campaign
workers got excellent experience, and supporters got a boost
of enthusiasm that they haven't had for nearly a decade. Hopefully
Campbell will follow his own advice, not worry and coast to
the kind of surprise that greeted Stephen Harper.
In
2000, the NDP won 1,093,838 votes nationwide; this time the
NDP won 2,116,536 nationwide. The increase of over 100% is
a victory that cannot be claimed by the Liberals or Conservatives,
but it translated into just 5 additional seats (14 in 2000,
19 now).
The NDP
won 5 seats in BC. It finished second in 15 seats. In New
Westminister-Coquitlam, the NDP finished second to the Conservatives
by only 55 votes. In that riding, a vote for the Liberals
helped elect a Conservative. The same was true in Vancouver
Island North where the Conservative candidate beat the NDP
by just 117 votes, and in the Southern Interior where the
Conservative candidate beat the NDP by 848 votes.
Canada's
political parties all have both good news and bad news coming
out of the election. For the Liberals, a minority government
is better than a complete loss. For the NDP, a substantial
increase in total vote and a modest increase in the number
of seats is short of expectations but an improvement. The
election lasted at least a week too long for the Conservatives,
but they road tested their new party and learned the consequences
of proposing the use of the not withstanding clause in the
Charter of Rights. The Greens hit the lotto with public sector
financing that will make them more prominent next time.
There
are 308 seats in the new federal parliament. Half of that
is 154 which is why 155 is referred to as the "magic
number" it takes to win by 50% plus one when all MPs
vote. The Liberals won 135 seats and the NDP 19. If they vote
together, they are one vote short of the magic number but
that presumes that all MPs are in attendance and that all
votes are divisive. All it takes is one member to be absent
to change that math. Everyone should wish Chuck Cadman a speedy
recovery from his illness. A relapse or prolonged recovery
will change the math in the House making it possible for government
to survive a confidence motion with one less crucial vote.
Paul Martin
may face more difficulties from his caucus than he faces from
the NDP, the Block or the Conservatives. Martin promised a
new independence for his MPs. In a slim minority government,
each of his MPs can threaten to bring down his government.
No one is dispensable; they will soon realize what that means
in terms of personal power. In BC there are four or five MPs
who probably expect cabinet positions (Anderson, Dosanjh,
Emerson, K. Martin and Owen). It would take a very large cabinet
to accommodate all of those expectations and still serve the
rest of the country, but it would take a courageous Prime
Minister to disappoint any of them.
Despite
record turnout for advanced voting, voter turnout continued
its downward trend. Only
13 million of 22 million registered voters (60.5%) voted,
and not everyone who is eligible is registered. In ridings
where the difference between first and second place is less
than one vote per polling station, the low turnout must be
particularly frustrating. Campaign workers know that it can
be harder to persuade non-voters to vote than it is to change
who a regular voter awards with a vote.
Another
election is expected sometime in the fall of 2005 or spring
of 2006 since that is about as long as minority governments
typically last. This election became exciting because the
polls suggested that a Conservative minority government was
possible. Canada hadn't seen that possibility since the effective
demise of the Progressive Conservatives. Thanks to Stephen
Harper confirming his willingness to use the not withstanding
clause to overrule the Charter of Rights, and Randy White's
elaboration on what many feared as a hidden socially conservative
agenda, the Conservative hopes were dashed in a rush back
to the lesser of two evils. The Conservatives will require
a new leader with roots as a true Progressive Conservative
before voters again give them a chance like they had this
time.
The NDP
also has something to learn out of the campaign. It doesn't
help to be dead right. Even if the inheritance tax proposal
was intellectually sound, it did not help the campaign and
it stood no chance of being implemented. It put Layton on
the defensive and distracted attention from the rest of the
tax fairness agenda. A platform needs to be tested by people
with good political judgment. In May 2005 Carole James will
face a much tougher test than Layton because she has a chance
to form a government. She needs to learn from the mistakes
that were made, recognize issues that must be addressed (like
public sector bargaining), and be prepared to convincingly
respond so as to control the agenda. Most of all, she needs
to reject ridiculous platform proposals that may be dead right.
|