Strategic Thoughts

bannerspacerAbout Me | Mail Me | My Stuffbannerspacer2

May 20, 2003

Mental Health - No Answers on Funding

Health Minister Collin Hansen and Minister of State Gulzar Cheema admitted that they have no way of assuring how much money will be spent on mental health.

On budget day the "service plan" for the Ministry of Health Services was delayed due to the federal funding announcement just days before the budget. The interim plan that was tabled in February was recently replaced with a document that claims that $1.067 billion will be spent on mental health services in 2003-04. If that is true, one should be able to trace that amount through the budget and financial statements of the government and its agencies, the health authorities. After extensive questioning by Joy MacPhail and Jenny Kwan in legislative debate on Thursday, May 15th, Health Minister Collin Hansen admitted that he really doesn't know how much the health authorities will decide to spend on mental health. Hansen, Cheema and Whittred signed off on the service plan saying that they are accountable. How can they be accountable when they admit that they have no way of assuring how the money will be spent, or whether what they identify as money for mental health will be spent on something completely unrelated?

On May 15th Hansen said:

"We have designed a population needs-based funding formula that ensures the health authorities get a fair allocation of the health budget to manage the range of health care delivery challenges that they have in their regions. Included in that is mental health. They then make the determination as to how they can best meet the needs of their population, because I'm the first one to admit that a health care delivery system that we designed to work in Victoria is not necessarily going to work in Vanderhoof or in Smithers. We have allowed for that regional difference in the approaches to how mental health services are delivered."

"We want to make sure we get good outcomes, and that's why so much effort is focused on measuring outcomes rather than measuring the inputs. Are there accountabilities? Yes. We are able to report through the health authorities, and when they come out with their final year-end financial statements - which are in the process of being finalized - the member can look back in terms of how they allocated the moneys that we flowed to them through their population needs-based funding. But we are not, in our budgets in the Ministry of Health Services, dictating to the health authorities that they have to spend X amount of dollars in X centre or in X community or in delivering a particular program, because we want to make sure they have the flexibility to deliver programs at the regional and local level that actually meet the needs of the people who live there."

People in the community know that the health authorities have cut the budget for dozens of community based mental health facilities. In legislative debate, MacPhail and Kwan attempted to get the ministers to answer a simple question about funding for the Arrowhead Centre Society on the Sunshine Coast. No one in government could or would answer. There is no accountability in the Campbell government for mental health, or for much else. Where "outcome measurements" do exist they frequently aren't independent of government and aren't available until two or more years after the fact. In the meantime, people on the ground know that programs are being cut and that services people need no longer exist. Mental health drop-in programs are disappearing.

 

About Me | Mail Me | Navigation | Top
© 2003 David D. Schreck. All Rights Reserved.