Update:
When the legislation was introduced on December 16, Bill
99, it was obvious that it wasn't necessary if Premier
Campbell, Duncan Davies (President of Forest Industrial
Relations), and IWA President Dave Haggard were straightforward.
Opposition House Leader Joy MacPhail forcefully pointed
out that the only thing added by the legislation was the
ability to impose binding arbitration. Several IWA locals
and many individual IWA members, joined by small forest
companies, objected to the legislation according to MacPhail.
It looks like the impression given by Haggard, Davies, and
Campbell was misleading. No one said what the real reason
is for legislation - perhaps the reason is to force union
locals and small companies to bend to the will of the "leadership".
December
14, 2003
Forest
Industry takes Hint from BC Ferry Workers
It
is too bad that it has taken since November 21st for the coastal
forest
industry and the IWA
to achieve the same outcome that the BC Ferry workers achieved
in less than a week. On Tuesday, December 16th, a special
session of the legislature will see a Bill go through all
stages in one day so as to provide the legal framework for
an agreement that both the union and the industry have already
endorsed. That agreement does not settle the dispute, but
it puts an arbitration process in place that will probably
be binding on the parties, although the IWA is still saying
that it hopes its members will be allowed to vote on final
proposal.
As a result
of the agreement to accept arbitration, members of the IWA
will not lose any Christmas and New Year holiday pay or vacation,
and they will return to the contract that was in place prior
to the dispute - the company unilaterally imposed its last
offer which led to the full scale strike.
According
to the government
news release:
"In
the spirit of the season and in the interests of all British
Columbians, both parties have agreed that it's time to resolve
this dispute with the help of enabling legislation,"
Campbell said. "It's a difficult, but necessary measure
that will give both parties the process and mediator/facilitator
that they agree is right to resolve this dispute now."
The release's
headline "Legislature Recalled to End Forest Strike",
and some early news coverage, created the impression that
the government had taken the initiative to end the dispute.
The truth is that the government is acting as a facilitator
putting the legal framework in place that enables the process
agreed to by both parties. That is the kind of role we need
to see more often from the Campbell government.
|