February
6, 2003
Plant's
Judgment
Is Attorney
General Geoff Plant trying to rescue his political credibility
at the expense of the sentencing judge in the street racing
case?
Like
everyone I have heard on radio talk shows, I am shocked
and disappointed that two street racers can get off with
house arrest after killing an innocent woman. What protects
people from vigilante justice and mob rule is the law. No
matter how strongly I feel, and no matter how I articulate
my anger, it is essential that we have a judicial system
that acts independently. If we don't like that, then Parliament
can amend the Criminal Code so as to impose mandatory sentences.
In the meantime, the Attorney General needs to separate
his role from that of people like me who are angry about
the sentence.
The
job of the Attorney General is to be accountable for his
staff who determine whether an appeal is warranted. He is
also responsible for defending the independence of judicial
decisions. Having made a fool of himself by defending judicial
independence in the context of the smoking judge while he
was withholding information on the judge's willingness to
share the cost, it now looks like Plant is overcompensating
by stepping out of his role and behaving like a member of
the public in attacking the sentencing judge. The Attorney
General is not any member of the public. He has particular
responsibilities, and he is now failing in those responsibilities
as badly as he did with the smoking judge.
January
31 , 2003
Damage
Control on the Smoking Judge
Are
judges allowed to violate city by-laws, or is that yet another
example of a double standard in the New Era? Section 6.5(e)
of the City of Vancouver Health By-law says "Where
smoking is permitted in a smoking room by this By-law the
smoking room shall be equipped so that its only use is to
permit persons to smoke." In other words, a smoking
room cannot double as a judge's chamber.
It is
sensible that the Vancouver by-law plugged the loop hole
that would allow big shots to designate their offices as
smoking rooms. A smoking room is nothing but a smoking room,
and Attorney General Geoff Plant continues to be part of
a double standard by allowing the judge to violate the by-law.
When
the Campbell government was overruling the WCB so as to
permit smoking, the WCB made it clear that no ventilation
system is capable of making a workplace safe from second
hand smoke. Whether the judge pays for all or part of her
ventilation system is irrelevant. Smoking poses a deadly
hazard, ventilation system or not. Using a designated smoking
room as an office, or chamber, is a violation of the City's
by-law.
Some
BC Liberal backbenchers have started to openly criticize
Geoff Plant as a result of his acceptance of the double
standard. No doubt their courage is related to the Premier's
escapades in Maui and van Dongen's resignation. Announcing
that the smoking judge will now pay part of the costs of
the ventilation system misses the point. The City of Vancouver
by-law is being flouted and the WCB regulation is not being
enforced. Whoever pays, and whether by-laws are enforceable
in a court house or not, the double standard remains.
While
the ventilation system should never have been installed,
the issue of how much the judge pays for it has become another
embarrassment for Plant. CBC
reported that the judge offered to pay $12,000 and Plant
failed to make that information public when he learned of
it. He then tried to blame his cover up on the media by
saying ""I actually never, never apologize to
myself for the failure of the media - in the course of asking
me dozens and dozens of questions, for me to assume facts
that might be of interest." Plant behaved as if he
has no obligation to tell the full truth unless a specific
question is asked that happens to hit on it. British Columbia
deserves far better.
January
20, 2003
Double
Standards
Poor
Gordon Campbell! Just as his handlers are thinking their
worst week is behind them, another case of hypocrisy in
the New Era hit the front page.
When
a judge threatened to retire if she couldn't smoke, the
Attorney General concluded that it was cheaper to install
a ventilation system in her office. That is the kind of
hypocritical double standard British Columbians were shocked
to see when their Premier was behind bars in a Maui jail.
Virtually no one doubts that if any other member of the
BC Liberal caucus, other than the Premier, had been jailed,
they would have been thrown out of cabinet and caucus. Likewise,
most people believe that if anyone other than the judge
insisted on smoking in their office they would be fired.
It is offensive to have lower standards for the rich and
powerful.
Ironically
the ventilation system may not resolve the legal problem
for the smoking judge, but it appears that no one will attempt
to enforce or interpret the law. Prior to the government
caving in to the tobacco industry and over ruling the WCB
with respect to smoking in bars, the WCB forcefully argued
that no ventilation system could adequately eliminate the
workplace hazard posed by second hand smoke. Government
amended the regulation to exempt bars; it did not amend
the regulation to exempt court houses or any part of them.
It is also the case that the City of Vancouver Health by-law,
provides in Section 6 that smoking shall not be allowed
in work places except in designated smoking rooms and that
designated smoking rooms must not be used for any purpose
other than for smoking - certainly not for use as an office.
The
Attorney General has tried to justify his hypocrisy on the
grounds of judicial independence. No one is talking about
interference in a court case, or interference in any aspect
of a judge's decision with respect to a case. The issue
concerning the smoking judge is an issue of working conditions
for those in a court house, and double standards in allowing
a judge to apparently flaunt the City of Vancouver by-law
and the WCB regulation. Geoff Plant did not think it was
"judicial interference" when he closed court houses;
how can stopping a health hazard be interference?
The
Premier and the smoking judge aren't the only ones who benefit
from the double standards of the Campbell government. On
day one of the New Era, 8,000 people who earned over $250,000
per year received tax cuts averaging $26,000 per year. Hundreds
of thousands of other British Columbians received so little
that they ended up in the hole after MSP premiums were raised
by 50% and a half point was tacked onto the sales tax. People
at the bottom are used to being shafted by the Campbell
government. It is all the more painful when privileges for
the rich and powerful are so blatantly rubbed in the noses
of those who pay the bills.