Strategic Thoughts

bannerspacerAbout Me | Mail Me | My Stuffbannerspacer2

March 26, 2003

Painful Dislocation for Forestry

"These measures will not be easy, painless or welcomed by all. Restructuring of this magnitude simply cannot be made without some short-term dislocation. But restructuring is needed now. It cannot wait."
"The Coastal industry is in deep trouble and has implored the government to act, despite the attendant hardships and growing pains that will inevitably result in the short-term. To delay further would be to invite devastating consequences and unthinkable permanent job losses."

Throne Speech, February 11, 2003

The Campbell government will announce its painful changes to forestry on Wednesday, March 26. As unusual as it was for the Throne Speech to foreshadow painful changes, the Speech suggested that the pain and dislocation would be short-term. Don't hold your breath waiting for the government to define how long the short-term may be, or to provide estimates of future employment levels in the forest industry.

Campbell's New Era Document promised to "Increase the Allowable Annual Cut over time through scientific forest management, proper planning, and incentives to promote enhanced silviculture." Don't expect government to put numbers on its promise by saying how long it will take to increase the cut or to what level. Vague promises about long run benefits and increased timber supply are sugar coating for a bitter pill as the government moves to satisfy the US on market reforms.

A key question that the US will examine when it looks at changes in BC's stumpage system will be whether the market in standing timber and logs is "significant". BC has set aside $275 million as a one time fund to assist with the transition in forestry. Most of that will be used to compensate companies who will lose existing tenure rights. It is unlikely that $275 million can buy enough tenure to create a "significant market".

The US believes that "Provincial programs contain a number of conditions, including tenure, processing, and cut restrictions, that insulate lumber producers from the market." The US also warned that "Properly structured timber auctions or log markets must also eliminate the potential for collusion among bidders on timber sales." The US has specifically said that regulations dealing with minimum cuts, local processing requirements and restrictions on mill closures must be eliminated. Those changes will produce the pain that was mentioned in this year's Throne Speech. They will result in the loss of a significant number of jobs. That might be described as a move to market driven efficiency. In choosing that course, the BC government has a responsibility to provide assistance to workers and communities that will be on the losing side of the changes. It is not good enough to say to "dislocated" forest workers, as they did to government workers, "good luck in the market economy."

 

About Me | Mail Me | Navigation | Top
© 2003 David D. Schreck. All Rights Reserved.