February
28, 2003
Organizing
for 2005
It
is common to hear people talk about what the NDP is going
to do to renew, rather than what people can do to renew
the NDP. There is an enormous difference.
The
party has scheduled a series of Community
Conferences beginning March 8-9 at the Images Theatre
at SFU. The conferences will be open to anyone who is interested,
not just party members. They will provide a forum for looking
at policy issues so as to question whether tweaking policies
will help to renew the party. More importantly, they will
provide a forum for non-members to rub shoulders with members
and see what they have in common.
Some
people may be deterred from becoming active in the NDP because
they feel that they are being asked to be like or follow
those who are already active. It may be more difficult,
but an alternative is to join and participate in changing
the party.
People
who are unhappy with the Campbell government have three
choices: 1) They can be quiet and take it, 2) They can form
a new party or join a small unsuccessful party, or 3) They
can rebuild the NDP. Option 1 is unacceptable for most people.
Option 2 is unlikely to succeed because the NDP wont
go away. Unlike the Social Credit or Reform parties, there
is likely to be a sufficiently large group of NDP loyalists
so as to assure that the anti-Campbell vote would be divided.
Option 3, rebuilding and changing the NDP, is the best way
of preventing that division. It would be more effective
for new people to take charge within the NDP than it would
be for new people to try to defeat both the NDP and the
BC Liberals.
The
renewed NDP will be defined, not just by an election platform,
but also by the people who are nominated as candidates for
the 2005 election. The focus for renewal should be on candidate
recruitment and the nomination process. Traditionally, potential
candidates emerge and they bring in new people to take key
positions on constituency executives. Those who are serious
about winning a nomination should begin this process soon.
Constituency executives set nomination dates and rules,
subject to whatever overall rules are set by the partys
provincial executive. The party will probably freeze nominations
until sometime in 2004. The constituency executives that
will likely be in office when nomination dates are set are
those that are elected in 2003. That means that potential
candidates who want to exert maximum influence should get
involved now so as to have as many friends and supporters
as possible on the executives that are elected in 2003.
That also increases the chances of influencing the election
of the provincial executive that will be chosen at the leadership
convention in November 2003. In simple terms, key decisions
that will determine who represents the NDP in the 2005 election
will start with membership drives in 2003.
Those
who want to change and renew the party should take an active
role in recruiting
new members now. The first step is to join, and attend
the nearest community conference to meet the current activists.
The second step is to encourage supporters to stand for
positions on constituency executives. The third step is
to set a nomination date and win the nomination. No one
should expect renewal to occur from the top down by inviting
stars to stand for uncontested nominations in
the most winnable ridings. Real politics happens through
organization and planning, and that requires signing up
supporters and winning votes at constituency meetings. Those
who think that is too difficult should prepare themselves
for many more years of Campbell style government. Change
takes organization. It is harder than attending a demonstration
or complaining about the latest cutback. If it is going
to happen, the work needs to start now with membership drives
that are necessary for winning nomination contests in 2004.
February
21, 2003
Preparing
for Election 2005
The
latest
McIntyre & Mustel poll showed a 7 point jump in
support for the Campbell Liberals. There is little or no
hope for those who want a moderate, reasonable government
if after the embarrassments and scandals revealed in January,
50% of voters would still vote for the Campbell government.
McIntyre & Mustel questioned 508 adults between February
6 and February 11. They report that their results have a
margin of error of plus or minus 4.5% at the 95% confidence
level. In other words, one time out of twenty, the error
may be much larger. Those of us who hope the latest poll
was the one out of twenty times when there is a bigger error
will be anxiously waiting for the Ipsos-Reid
poll that will be conducted the first week of March
and released in late March.
Whether
support for the Campbell Liberals is 50% or 40% is irrelevant
if progressive opposition cannot unite behind one party.
A group calling themselves "Coalition for BC"
is circulating emails, sponsoring a website and running
some advertisements asking people to "discuss a provincial
electoral coalition even more inclusive than the community
coalitions taking shape today across our province".
The group says that they are not calling for a new political
party but they talk about winning the 2005 provincial election.
Spaceship to group: Candidates running for political parties
win elections.
In a
question and answer section of their website, the group
advocating an "electoral coalition" comments on
how it might work by saying "There might be a provincial
meeting or process to decide how many candidates are NDP,
how many are Green and how many (if any at all) are from
neither party but from a community coalition, for example.
Or those decisions could be made at the constituency level
by some kind of open or joint nomination meeting."
Nomination meetings are places where party members vote
for the candidate of their choice. If anyone wants to wants
to defeat the BC Liberals, it will not happen by power brokering
organized by a handful of self selected coalition builders.
It will happen if those who want change join the NDP,
thereby changing it, and vote for new credible candidates
who will stand a good chance in the 2005 election. Efforts
to confuse people by pretending that some other process
can be made to work, do nothing but help Gordon Campbell
and the BC Liberals.