In its
May 4th edition, the Vancouver
Province quoted Education Minister Christy Clark saying
"Principals and vice-principals have a right and responsibility
to supervise teachers in classrooms." According to
the Province, she went on to say "For too long we've
had a model that assumes teachers and administrators are
enemies and children are widgets. They're not." Clark
is alleged to have made that statement at a B.C. Confederation
of Parent Advisory Councils conference in Burnaby.
It is
very disturbing that Clark thinks BC has had a model "that
assumes teachers and administrators are enemies and children
are widgets." That strong rhetoric should be backed
up with specific evidence. Which schools treat students
as widgets? Name the administrator or teacher that views
colleagues in education as "enemies". It looks
like Christy Clark is again engaged in teacher bashing,
but this time the B.C. Principals and Vice-Principals Association
has every reason to object to how its members are being
portrayed as incompetent.
An
announcement regarding $60,000 to the B.C. Principals and
Vice-Principals Association formed part of the background
for Clark's unfortunate rhetoric. On her website, the news
release was labeled "Draft". The Minister's remarks
also sounded like a rough draft. She should apologize for
the words that passed her lips, or else she should produce
the specific cases.
The
backgrounder to Clark's "draft" news release says
that "Principals have the right and responsibility
to supervise teachers in the classroom, and this is an important
component of this program." What it doesn't say is
that principals have had that right and responsibility for
decades. As is frequently the case with Clark's announcements,
much of what is announced is not new. What is new is a program
whose aim includes increasing the amount of time principals
spend in the classroom observing teaching. Wouldn't a results
oriented school system allocate its administrators to problem
areas rather than to a broad brush program? Of course, it
is school boards who determine how to allocate staff, not
the Minister of Education.
Perhaps
Minister Clark could benefit from some skills upgrading.
Graduate programs in leadership are available, but one would
first have to demonstrate successful completion of an undergraduate
degree. While working on her needed improvements, Clark
would be well advised to limit her remarks to supporting
partners in education rather than making unfounded claims
about models that never existed.