May
1, 2002
Dramatic
Change or Open and Honest Dialogue?
"We've
been entrusted with an unprecedented opportunity to affect
dramatic change. That opportunity carries with it an obligation
to ensure that our government carries out this trust in
a way that is always responsible to the people we serve."
Premier Gordon Campbell, Swearing-In Ceremony, June 5,
2001
We should
have known when Premier Campbell spoke of an "opportunity
to affect dramatic change" that there would be
trouble ahead. Perhaps we were lulled by the Premier's recognition
to carry out that trust in a way that is always responsible
to the people. He went on in that June 5th speech to say
"Truly responsible government invites public participation
and open and honest dialogue." Now it looks like
that concept of accountability means the people are to be
kept in the dark and wait until May 17, 2005, for their
one day of accountability. That is not the way it is supposed
to work and the words of the Premier acknowledged that when
he concluded his speech saying:
"In
the next four years, our government will reach out as never
before to ensure that all citizens can help shape that future
and share its benefits, to revitalize our democracy and
rekindle our spirit. We have big issues to tackle that must
be resolved with fairness, cooperation, and determination.
Throughout the last weeks I have asked British Columbians
to join us as we strive to create a new era of hope and
prosperity."
It is
not too late for Premier Campbell to return to his election
promises and to his June 5th commitment that "government
will reach out as never before" to involve citizens.
Rather than calling every critic a special interest whether
they are Anglican Bishops or labour representatives, the
Premier has an opportunity to go back to the participatory
style he originally promised. No one wants three years
of confrontation and conflict. The last election is over.
One quarter of the Campbell government's term is over. It
really is time to work together to build BC's future but
that takes a government that truly believes in involving
its citizens in the process of change.
The
only time the New Era Document mentioned "dramatic",
it referred to tax cuts and claimed they would pay for themselves.
It referred to the need for more nurses, more doctors and
more hospital beds, but it did not say anything about sudden
radical non-consultative restructuring. In fact, it spoke
about consulting with people so as to develop ten year plans.
The
fundamental conflict within the Campbell government was
indicated on June 5th with the contradictory concepts of
"affecting dramatic change" and inviting "public
participation and open and honest dialogue". Instead
of pigheadedly insisting on arbitrary deadlines, it is time
to drop "dramatic change" and try for constructive
change based on "public participation and open and
honest dialogue."
|