June
12, 2002
Myths
101: Refuting the Taxpayers Federation
Seth
Klein of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives must
have hit a nerve with his June 6th column that argued "government
has choices". Not only did Finance Minister Gary Collins
respond with a letter to the editor, but Mark Milke of the
Canadian Taxpayers Federation did an Op Ed piece in which
he dragged out a bunch of straw men and then attempted to
knock each down as if he were refuting Klein.
One
foot in a bucket of ice and the other in a bucket of coals
does not make for a pleasing average temperature. Averages
are like that. They hide a lot of information about what
is happening to individuals. When one looks at taxation,
it is misleading to use the right wing's "tax freedom
day". That was Milke's first myth when he attempted
to argue against BC's tax regime in the 1990s.
Milke
would be well advised to recall his own record of criticizing
the Campbell government. That doesn't happen very often
so he should be able to remember the handful of cases. On
February 7, 2002, Milke issued a news release saying:
Paying
50% more for the MSP premium costs a family with a $40,000
income just as much as it does a family with a $150,000
income but the lower income family will have to work longer
to pay that tax. Milke's use of a so called "tax freedom
day" to argue about the incidence of taxation overlooks
that kind of inequity.
The
Ministry of Finance includes examples of taxes paid by families
with varying circumstances as part of the background tables
in budget documents. Those tables also compare taxes for
families in each province. In the last
NDP budget, those tables H2-H4 were found on pages 129-132
of the budget documents. In one example, those tables compare
a two income family of four with $60,000 combined income.
After considering provincial income tax, net child benefits,
gross and net property tax, sales tax, fuel tax, health
care premiums/taxes, federal income tax, and net GST, in
BC the family was estimated to pay a total of $14,478 compared
to $13,394 in Alberta and $15,465 in Ontario. Changes in
BC taxes since 2001 do not change BC's position in that
comparison.
Milke's
second myth looked at spending in BC relative to other provinces.
He argued that, by his numbers, BC ranked fourth when comparing
provincial spending relative to the size of the provincial
economy. He then tried to rank BC lower because of equalization
payments. Equalization payments are made by the Federal
government to provinces that have less revenue generating
capacity than a hypothetical province. Ontario is the only
province that has never received such payments. There is
no basis for pretending that provinces that do not receive
such payments are in fact spending more by financing those
that do, and even if such an argument could be made it has
nothing to do with Klein's simple statement that "governments
have choices". They can choose to provide cancer drugs
or not. They can choose to separate elderly couples or not.
They can provide one third of one percent of taxpayers with
14% of the benefits from tax cuts or not.
Milke's
third myth was to say that more government spending will
not help the B.C. economy. He argued that there is no connection
between capital spending by government and per capita real
incomes. People who use the Island Highway, the Coquihalla
or any other transportation system would beg to differ with
Milke. Even Gordon Campbell's 2010 bid committee put improved
transportation systems at the top of their list of essential
requirements.
Finally,
Milke claimed it was a myth that B.C.'s job creation record
was superb in the 1990s. He argued that inter-provincial
migration, particularly to Alberta, somehow made BC's unemployment
look better than it would otherwise. He thereby moved from
the question of jobs to the question of unemployment rates
(determined by both the size of the labour force and the
number of jobs). BC's labour force and population did increase
during the 1990s despite movements to and from Alberta.
On the job front BC's economy created 374,200 jobs during
those years while so far in the first full year of the New
Era the BC economy lost almost 25,000 jobs.
Milke
concluded that BC should follow the example of Hong Kong
and Singapore if it wants to achieve economic success. According
to Milke those economies moved from shantytowns to first
world status over the course of 40 years through moderate
tax levels and limited government intervention. It doesn't
take much research to discover that the government is heavily
involved in Singapore's
economy with 60% of the GDP coming from government
linked companies.
BC has
a resourced based economy that has been in transition for
over 20 years. Commodity prices have been in decline relative
to other goods and services for decades. Resource based
economies need to diversify. BC achieved some success in
diversification over the past 20 years and it needs to achieve
more. BC need look no farther than Oregon
to see an example of an economy that has gone through the
same kind of change.
Economic
success depends on understanding the changing structure
of the BC economy. Not understanding how BC's economy is
changing will contribute to bad public policy choices.