May
20, 2002
May
Polls
A poll
is just a snapshot in time, and not necessarily an accurate
one at that. Nevertheless, political hacks seize on every
subtly as they interpret the polls.
Ipsos-Reid,
McIntyre
& Mustel, and Marktrend
are the most often quoted pollsters in BC. Of those, Ipsos-Reid
stands light years ahead with its standards of transparency
and full public disclosure. Anyone can download the full
detailed tables that reveal their questions and results
(pdf).
The
table below makes use of the detailed Ipsos-Reid results
from their late election poll (May 2001) and their recent
poll (May 2002). No matter which demographic is examined,
gender, income, union status or age, the BC Liberals are
falling. Of course, if an election were held today they
would still win, but an election is not going to be held
for three years. If the Campbell government stays the course
with more cuts (as currently scheduled) combined with the
dismantling of ICBC, BC Hydro and other crown corporations,
future polls may look even worse for the party with the
largest majority in BC history.
Traditionally
the NDP did better amongst women, in union households and
in middle and lower income households. In last year's election,
the BC Liberals had a substantial lead in all categories.
The table below shows traditional gaps returning. Party
preferences among women are 38% BC Liberal, 32% NDP and
23% Green. Amongst 18-34 year olds, preferences are 34%
BC Liberal, 29% NDP and 28% Green. For all demographic groups
except union households, the BC Liberals continue to lead
but it is becoming a real horse race with three years to
go.
|
Comparison
of Ipsos-Reid Polls
May 2001 vs. May 2002
|
|
BC
Liberal
|
NDP
|
Green
|
| Actual
election results: |
58%
|
22%
|
12%
|
| Poll all
decided voters |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
63%
|
16%
|
13%
|
| 2002 |
45%
|
27%
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
| Men |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
62%
|
16%
|
13%
|
| 2002 |
52%
|
23%
|
17%
|
|
|
|
|
| Women |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
64%
|
16%
|
13%
|
| 2002 |
38%
|
32%
|
23%
|
|
|
|
|
| Age 55
and over |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
69%
|
17%
|
10%
|
| 2002 |
58%
|
25%
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
| Age 35-54 |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
61%
|
19%
|
15%
|
| 2002 |
45%
|
27%
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
| Age 18-34 |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
60%
|
13%
|
14%
|
| 2002 |
34%
|
29%
|
28%
|
|
|
|
|
| Under $30,000
income |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
59%
|
18%
|
12%
|
| 2002 |
33%
|
29%
|
29%
|
|
|
|
|
| $30-$60,000
income |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
63%
|
17%
|
14%
|
| 2002 |
44%
|
26%
|
19%
|
|
|
|
|
| Over $60,000
income |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
66%
|
15%
|
13%
|
| 2002 |
50%
|
29%
|
15%
|
|
|
|
|
| Private
sector union |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
47%
|
27%
|
12%
|
| 2002 |
32%
|
37%
|
16%
|
|
|
|
|
| Public
sector union |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
50%
|
19%
|
24%
|
| 2002 |
28%
|
41%
|
24%
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-union |
|
|
|
| 2001 |
69%
|
14%
|
10%
|
| 2002 |
53%
|
21%
|
19%
|