Strategic Thoughts

bannerspacerAbout Me | Mail Me | My Stuffbannerspacer2

October 1 , 2002

Measuring Health Status

On September 30th every province released a report on nationally comparable performance indicators for health status. The report originates as part of a commitment made by all provinces in 1998 to work with the Canadian Institute of Health Information and Statistics Canada to improve health information systems. Health Planning Minister Sindi Hawkins tried to tie the report to her government's promises by saying:

"The release of this report is consistent with our government's New Era commitments to increased accountability and a stronger focus on health planning and health quality. Our emphasis on performance measurement and accountability is reflected in three-year ministry service plans, ministry annual reports, and performance agreements with health authorities."

Contrary to Hawkin's claims, the report provides a standard for criticizing the ministry service plans and performance agreements in the New Era. Unlike the New Era documents that focus on budgets, the health status report focuses on outcomes. The Campbell government dropped infant mortality from its service plan as a performance measure although its inclusion in the health status report emphasizes its important role in comparing outcomes across provinces and over time in BC.

The health status report describes the importance of infant mortality by saying:

"The infant mortality rate is a long established measure of child health that also indicates the well-being of a society. It reflects not only the level of mortality, but also the health status and health care of population, the effectiveness of preventive care and the attention paid to maternal and child health, as well as broader social factors such as maternal education, smoking, and relative deprivation."

The Campbell government has not explained why it has deleted infant mortality as a performance measure from both the overall government strategic plan and from the service plan for the Ministry of Health. Nevertheless, health professionals everywhere will continue to use infant mortality as a key indicator and will sound the alarm should it rise as the result of changes in the New Era.

The Campbell government has chosen to make the health status report available via the new website that was developed as part of the government television ad campaign on health care. That campaign was recently extended although no one in government has been willing to provide information on how much more is being spent to broadcast the ads. Health Status ReportYou won't find a link to the health status report on the top level government website, nor on the websites for the Ministries of Health but if you are at the TV ad website and you click on a graphic with the words "Latest Health Info", you will find the page with the report. To save time you can get the same result by clicking on that graphic reproduced here for the 417 Kb pdf file.

The health status report provides information on 64 of 67 indicators defined by the Conference of Deputy Health Ministers. BC does not yet have data for three indicators: Utilization of home care services, 30-day acute myocardial infarction mortality rate and 30-day stroke mortality rate.

The full health status report will not be published again for two years; however, some of the indicators are published on an annual basis by Vital Statistics or by other branches of the Ministries of Health.

Improvements in health information systems that allow for the consistent measurement of health outcomes will not only help in holding governments accountable, but they will also help in the development of evidence based protocols for service delivery.

For Alberta's report see http://www.gov.ab.ca/home/news/dsp_feature.cfm?lkFid=241

For Ontario's report see http://www.gov.on.ca/health/english/pub/ministry/pirc/pirc_mn.html


August 28, 2002

Infant Mortality - Measured and Ignored

Statistics on infant mortality are more than the canary in the coalmine. They are used as a key measure of the health of populations. On Wednesday, August 28th, Health Planning Minister Sindi Hawkins appeared for a few brief moments on CKNW's Rafe Mair show with guest host Peter Warren in order to "explain" why her government no longer considers infant mortality as a measure of its performance. Graph of Infant Mortality RatesShe claimed that deleting infant mortality as an measure of government's progress isn't important since Vital Statistics will still measure it.

The graph shown here is from page 51 of the annual report for the Ministry of Health Services that Collin Hansen released last month. It shows that the infant mortality rate declined throughout the period of NDP government. It reached record lows for both the general population and for the aboriginal population in 2000 (the last year reported). The Campbell government has said that it will use infant mortality for the aboriginal population as an important measure in its service plan for the Ministry of Health Services but it will not use infant mortality for the overall population as a measure of performance for any aspect of government.

The public will be free to draw its own conclusions on whether infant mortality says anything about the performance of government. We should be concerned if it rises for any reason. At a time when child protection services are being cut, when welfare policy is being criticized, when health care is being reorganized and when tax burdens are being shifted downwards, any rise in infant mortality could indicate problems with government policy.

 

Also see: Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System


August 23, 2002

Infant Mortality Ignored by Minister

Speaking with Peter Warren on CKNW's Rafe Mair show Health Minister Collin Hansen admitted that he didn't know whether infant mortality is one of the criteria used to measure whether his ministry is achieving its goals. Government is likely to ignore those things that aren't used to measure its performance. Worse, it is likely to ignore those things that it has intentionally dropped from its performance measurements! Hansen knows that his pay will be cut if he doesn't live within his budget. His pay will not be cut if infant mortality increases under his watch.

The current government uses the term "service plan" to describe its goals and the criteria used to measure whether those goals have been achieved. Under the former government this was called a "performance plan".

The last performance plan for the Ministry of Health under the NDP government can be found at http://www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/cpa/publications/performance01.pdf In it you will find that infant mortality was not only a key measure for the Ministry of Health but it was also one of the key measures for the overall strategic plan for all of government. (see pages 7 and 43)

The service plan for Collin Hansen's Ministry is found at http://www.gov.bc.ca/prem/popt/corereview/srv_pln/hlthser/hs.pdf On page 14 it says that the goal of improved health and wellness for British Columbians will be measured by "7. Improved health status for Aboriginal peoples measured by infant mortality and life expectancy." There is no other reference to infant mortality in the Ministry's service plan. In other words, infant mortality for over 95% of the province's population had been dropped by the Campbell government as a measure of performance for the Ministry of Health.

The former government also introduced BC's first Strategic Plan (pdf). The overall Strategic Plan for the Campbell government can be found at http://www.gov.bc.ca/prem/popt/corereview/StrategicPlan/Strategic_Plan_02.pdf Unlike the NDP government's Strategic Plan, there is no reference to infant mortality in Campbell's document but that is not surprising since they also removed it from the service plan for the Ministry of Health.

 

About Me | Mail Me | Navigation | Top
© 2002 David D. Schreck. All Rights Reserved.