February
10, 2002
Extra
Charges at the Pharmacy
Some
pharmacies in BC are taking advantage of higher user fees
on Pharmacare to sneak in even higher dispensing fees -
fees that come out of the pockets of seniors and are not
recognized by Pharmacare.
Pharmacare
pays for over 6.3 million prescriptions per year for seniors.
We will have to wait to see whether higher user fees results
in a non-compliance problem. That is when a physician writes
a prescription but it is never filled. For the time being
we know of an immediate problem in the filling of prescriptions.
Some drug stores are taking advantage of the higher $25
user fee ($10 for low income seniors) to sneak in extra
charges.
Pharmacare
will not recognize a dispensing fee of more than $7.80 as
an eligible expense for reimbursement. Some seniors are
reporting that rather than receiving a bill for $10 or $25
as expected with the new higher user fees, they are getting
something like $26.20. That is because the store is tacking
on an extra $1.20 making the dispensing fee $9.00. In determining
whether a senior has reached the $275 (or $200 low income)
annual maximum, those extra charges are ignored. The user
fee is based on the total of the maximum dispensing fee
recognized by Pharmacare plus the ingredient cost.
With
6.3 million prescriptions being filled for seniors, an extra
$1.20 per prescription could mean over $7.5 million in extra
charges being pocketed by pharmacies. The only way to stop
this practice is for seniors to shop around to make sure
they aren't paying something extra on top of the already
increased user fee. No user fee for seniors on Pharmacare
should be more that $25.00 - anything more is an extra charge
by the pharmacy.
February
9, 2002
Unraveling
User Fees and Premium Taxes
Some
seniors have reported that their Pharmacare user fee is
$26.20 rather than the $25.00 announced by government. It
turns out the extra $1.20 (or more) is going to the drug
store for its dispensing fee. Last year the user fee
was equal to the dispensing fee. This year the user fee
is $25 for seniors who do not receive MSP premium tax subsidy
and $10 for those that do. ON TOP of that user fee pharmacies
can charge the amount that their dispensing fee exceeds
the maximum dispensing fee allowed by Pharmacare ($7.80
previously $7.60). In calculating the $275 annual maximum
for user fees the excess dispensing fees DO NOT COUNT (are
not an eligible expense). Think of the extra $1.20 or
whatever it could be as an extra bill from the drug store.
Shop around because $25 should be the maximum - anything
above that is gouging by the pharmacy!
February
6, 2002
Income
Tests for Pharmacare
$1,300 in bills for the losers!
In 2003
some BC seniors with very large drug bills could end up
paying $1,300 per year compared to $200 last year and $275
this year. Of course, anyone needing that much in drugs
would also be very sick. Before the Campbell government
makes such dramatic changes to Pharmacare,
it ought to put all the options government is considering
for Pharmacare before the public for discussion and input.
Those
who argue that benefits should not depend on age fail to
see that seniors are different from younger British Columbians.
Seniors have much higher need for drugs and they have
much lower incomes with no further opportunity in life to
make up for loses. One of the original reasons for creating
Medicare to replace private health insurance was because
private insurers kicked seniors off their plans. We appear
to be going back to those bad old days as Pharmacare gets
changed to reduce coverage when people need it most - when
they get older.
Changes
made to Pharmacare in 2002 suggest the next step that will
be implemented in 2003. The charges to Pharmacare for seniors
this year increased the user fee to $25 (or the full cost
if the total cost was under $25). The annual maximum for
all such user fees was increased to $275 (in 2001 it was
$200) after which no further user fees are collected.
A
further important change was made by splitting Pharmacare
for seniors (Plan A) into two parts. The new second part
applies to seniors who receive premium assistance. It
suggests how a broader income test will apply starting next
year. For 2002 seniors who receive Medical Services Plan
Premium Assistance have a user fee of $10 rather than $25
and an annual maximum of $200 rather than $275.
The
next step in 2003 might be to eliminate Pharmacare for all
seniors who do not qualify for premium assistance and treat
those people the same as someone under age 65. Pharmacare's
Plan E (Universal) (pdf)
does not cover the first $1,000 in eligible drugs for a
family. After a family has reached the $1,000 deductible,
Pharmacare will pays 70% of the cost of eligible benefits
and dispensing fees. Once a family has paid $2000 as their
portion, further eligible expenses in that year are 100%
covered.
For
Plan E patients receiving MSP Premium Assistance, the family
deductible is $800. When a family has paid $800 as their
portion, further eligible expenses in that year are covered
100%.
There
is one enormous difference between most people currently
covered under Plan E (universal Pharmacare) and those covered
under Plan A (Pharmacare for seniors). Seniors are far
more likely to have big drug bills. Cutting their coverage
doesn't just make them subject to a theoretical risk that
gets picked up by private insurance. Cutting coverage for
seniors actually makes them pay more when they can least
afford it and when they cannot get private insurance coverage.
The
changes in 2002 were linked to MSP
Premium Assistance. The MSP website describes premium
assistance saying: "Regular premium assistance offers
subsidies ranging from 20 to 100 per cent and is available
based on an individual's net income (or a couple's combined
net income) for the two preceding tax years, less deductions
for age, family size and disability. If the resulting amount
referred to as adjusted net income is $20,000 or less, a
subsidy is available."
Applying
for premium assistance requires the submission of a form
(pdf).
Family net income is the combined after income tax income
of both spouses minus $3,000 for each person who is 65 or
older minus a further $3,000 for couples and minus $3,000
for each disabled person (as defined for income tax deductions).
A couple both over age 65 would therefore qualify for at
least 20% off their premium if they had after tax family
income of less than $29,000 or about $33,000 gross income.
In order to qualify for 100% premium assistance, that
couple would have to have after tax family income of less
than $21,000.
The
Pharmacare office could not tell me whether the current
split in Pharmacare benefits for seniors requires full or
partial premium assistance. The Campbell government should
disclose what changes in income levels it is considering
for determining eligibility for premium assistance and full
Pharmacare benefits. That disclosure should come now, not
just before Christmas and the January 1, 2003, implementation
date.
Monthly
Premium Rates for 2002 until April -
Click here for 50% information
on 50% increase effective April 1, 2002
Five
levels of assistance, based on adjusted net income for the
previous year, are as follows:
|
Adjusted
Net Income
|
Premium
Rates
|
One
Person
|
Family
of Two
|
Family
of 3 or more
|
|
$0
- $12,000
|
100%
premium assistance
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
$12,001
- $14,000
|
80%
premium assistance
|
$7.20
|
$12.80
|
$14.40
|
|
$14,001
- $16,000
|
60%
premium assistance
|
$14.40
|
$25.60
|
$28.80
|
|
$16,001
- $18,000
|
40%
premium assistance
|
$21.60
|
$38.40
|
$43.20
|
|
$18,001
- $20,000
|
20%
premium assistance
|
$28.80
|
$51.20
|
$57.60
|
|
Over
$20,000
|
Full
Rate
|
$36.00
|
64.00
|
$72.00
|