July
30, 2002
Re-Regulating
BC Hydro Rates UP
Why
would the Campbell government let a nice guy like Richard
Neufeld go out on a limb without being told government's
direction? Neufeld, MLA for Peace River North and Minister
for Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources, was grilled Monday
on rate increases for BC Hydro.
Appearing
on CKNW's Bill Good show with guest host Ravi Baichwal,
Neufeld said that turning over one third of BC Hydro's staff
to Accenture is not really privatization. Apparently Neufeld
was not aware of last week's announcement by the State
Treasurer for California to ban
Accenture from state contracts because of its business
practices.
When
questioned about future Hydro rate increases,Neufeld said
that rate increases are up to the BC
Utilities Commission. The interim report of the government
Task Force, which includes one of the Premier's Deputy Ministers,
has recommended that prices rise by 30% or more to "market
rates".
Apparently
the Minister responsible for BC Hydro doesn't understand
BCUC rules on a detailed application made by BC Hydro. BC
Gas is currently engaged in exactly that procedure.
It's more than 400 page application is available for download
from its website (4.95
KB pdf).
Neufeld
told the CKNW listening audience that it would be no big
deal for the average rate payer to face a 2% increase in
Hydro bills. After all, argued Neufeld, the company has
had a rate freeze for several years. On domestic revenue
of almost $2.5 billion, a 2% rate increase would yield almost
$50 million per year. Neufeld was part of the Campbell opposition
caucus when they argued that the rate freeze was keeping
Hydro rates artificially high (even though they are amongst
the lowest in North America).
When
asked whether government would instruct BC Hydro on its
rate application to BCUC, Neufeld mumbled that government
wouldn't get involved because BCUC looks at all the aspects
of BC Hydro as they do for BC Gas. The Minister would benefit
from reading the BC gas application where they are currently
arguing for a rate increase in order to protect the company's
revenues at a time when sales are declining due to conservation.
In the words of the BC Gas application:
"The
Application requests approval for an increase in revenue
requirements equivalent to 1.25% of total current revenues
or a 3.29% increase as a percentage of delivery margin,
effective January 1, 2003. Of the 3.29%, 2.85% is due to
reduced consumption by residential and commercial customers."
BC Gas
is proposing to take its 2.85% on delivery margin from the
rate stabilization account and to make up the remaining
0.95% by increasing delivery charges.
Keep
in mind that the Campbell government has just made an announcement
about privatizing liquor stores without allowing competition
so that it can still make at least $650 million per year
on the sale of booze. Does Richard Neufeld seriously expect
anyone to believe that his government does not have revenue
targets for BC Hydro? Is he any less obligated to reach
those targets than his colleague, the Minister responsible
for booze? Anyone can read page 32 of the Minister of Finance's
February
budget documents to see that government is planning
on a $283 million "contribution" from BC Hydro
this year and a further $301 million in fiscal 2003-04 and
$297 million in fiscal 2004-05. Premier's Office to Neufeld:
BCUC had better not interfere in those revenue projections!
Of course those numbers do not include water taxes and other
means used to direct money from BC Hydro to general provincial
revenue.
Minister
Neufeld can claim that government is simply "re-regulating"
BC Hydro, but all the New Speak he can muster will not hide
another revenue grab.