September
23, 2002
Hydro
Rates: Letter to the Auditor General
The
Campbell government is emptying BC Hydro's rate stabilization
account. Their Energy
Task Force recommended in their interim report that
Hydro rates increase by 30% or more to so called market
(or California) levels. Is raiding Hydro's rate stabilization
fund the first step before rates go up?
Last
February's budget documents showed that Hydro would add
$5 million to the rate stabilization account, but the
First Quarter Report released by Finance Minister Gary
Collins on September 13th changed that to a $65 million
withdrawal. This leaves only $22 million in the rate stabilization
account. The change allows an increase of $59 million
in the "dividend" paid by Hydro to government.
Government
is able to get away with grabbing Hydro's funds as the
direct result of a change in accounting practices for
BC Hydro that DOES NOT CONFORM to Generally Accepted Accounting
Practices. The change was authorized, not by the Auditor
General, but by the BC Utilities Commission.
I
emailed the BC Utilities Commission, expressed concern
over their
rulings, and suggested that the Auditor General might
have trouble with a procedure that by the admission of
BCUC does not comply with Generally Accepted Accounting
Standards. A representative of the Commission replied:
"The
rationale for allowing BC Hydro to continue to defer and
amortize its foreign exchange gains and losses on foreign
exchange denominated long-term debt, using the straight-line
pooled method, was to maintain the regulatory objective
of smooth and stable rates for customers. This is consistent
with deferral and recovery of many large or volatile expenditures
by regulated utility companies. It is also consistent
with the Public Sector Accounting Board proposed Recommendations
for all levels of government which should form a section
of the CICA Public Sector Accounting Handbook. BC Hydro's
debt is guaranteed by the Government. We see no reason
why the Auditor General would be concerned and the ongoing
oversight of BC Hydro by the Commission should alleviate
concerns that an Enron situation might develop."
BC
Utility Commission's "regulatory objective of smooth
and stable rates for customers" is admirable. Unfortunately,
it appears that Hydro's accounting changes had the opposite
effect.
In
opposition, Gordon Campbell routinely criticized the NDP
saying that it was taking too much from Hydro. In both
opposition and as Premier, Campbell committed to following
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. It appears those
were just more promises to be broken.
The
following letter was faxed to the Auditor General on September
19th. We will have to wait and see whether the Auditor
General shares the opinion of the BC Utility Commission.
Mr.
Wayne K. Strelioff, CA September
19, 2002
Auditor General
8 Bastion Square by
fax to 250 387-1230
Victoria, British Columbia
V8V 1X4
Dear
Mr. Strelioff:
I
am writing to draw your attention to a change in accounting
practice at BC Hydro that has resulted in $59 million
being transferred from BC Hydro's rate stabilization account
to revenue in government's consolidated revenue fund.
The
footnote on the bottom of page 5 of government's recent
First Quarter Report explains the increase in Hydro's
dividend to government by saying: "The increased
dividend payment is a consequence of an accounting policy
change approved by the B.C. Utilities Commission for rate-setting
and reporting purposes that resulted in a higher level
of equity. The consequence of this change, given BC Hydro's
allowed rate of return, is higher dividend payments to
the Consolidated Revenue Fund."
I
contacted the BC Utilities Commission and received confirmation
of two changes in accounting practices that they authorized.
Those are:
1.
Order No. G-47-02
On July 11, 2002 the BCUC approved an application from
BC Hydro to change the accounting treatment and amortization
of foreign exchange gains and losses commencing April
1, 2002.
2.
Order No. G-53-02
On July 23, 2002 the BCUC approved an application from
BC Hydro to capitalize negotiation and litigation costs
associated with First Nations, and to amortize those costs
over a ten-year period commencing the 2001/02 fiscal year
(ie. April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002).
Note
that Order G-47-02 acknowledges that the change is contrary
to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Confusion
is bound to arise when the regulatory authority sets accounting
practices. We are only weeks away from accounting scandals
at WorldCom and Enron where the capitalization of normal
gains and loses resulted in a distortion of true financial
results. It is possible that the integrity of BC Hydro's
accounts could also be called into question as the result
of a change in accounting policy authorized by something
other than a body certified to regulate accounting practices.
The
change in accounting practices at BC Hydro carry through
and change government's consolidated revenue fund and
allow government to almost deplete Hydro's rate stabilization
account.
I
trust that by drawing this to your attention you will
indicate whether the changed accounting practices meet
with your approval.
Sincerely,
David D. Schreck
September
18, 2002
BC
Hydro: Higher Rates & Privitization by Stealth
The
Campbell government has raided BC Hydro's rate stabilization
fund. Could it be that it is setting the stage for privatization
and higher electricity rates?
The
February budget called for BC Hydro to contribute $283 million
to the government (consolidated revenue fund). Hydro's 2002-03
profit before the transfer was estimated to be $345 million
plus $5 million that would be added to Hydro's rate stabilization
account.
A minor
footnote on page 5 of Collins' First Quarter Report explains
how the government is increasing Hydro's "contribution"
by $59 million for fiscal 2002-03. The note says "The
increased dividend payment is a consequence of an accounting
policy change approved by the B.C. Utilities Commission
for rate-setting and reporting purposes that resulted in
a higher level of equity. The consequence of this change,
given BC Hydro's allowed rate of return, is higher dividend
payments to the Consolidated Revenue Fund." The increased
"dividend payment" raises Hydro's contribution
to central government operations to $342 million.
Page
30, table 2.6, of the First Quarter Report shows how Hydro
is going to get the extra $59 million to pay to the government.
Hydro's forecast profit is shown as $70 million higher,
increasing from $345 million to $415 million. A couple
of lines later one sees where the $70 million comes from,
as the transfer from the rate stabilization fund is changed
from a positive $5 million to a negative $65 million. (Accounting
Note: Because of the raid on the rate stabilization account,
this is not just a transfer between the summary and CRF
accounts. The money is first added to the summary account
from Hydro's rate stabilization account.)
BC Hydro
released its first quarter report just two days before the
Finance Minister released the report for the province. Hydro's
first quarter report revealed that it would have to
almost exhaust its rate stabilization fund in order to meet
the demands of government (reducing it to $22 million).
In Opposition Gordon Campbell attacked the NDP saying that
it was using Hydro as a cash cow. In government Premier
Gordon Campbell is milking harder! With the rate stabilization
fund nearly exhausted the stage is set for charging you
more for your electricity. Welcome to the New Era. Higher
rates for electricity are part of the Campbell government's
plan for privatization of Hydro. You can expect government's
revenue grab to be disguised with rhetoric about higher
rates being necessary to attract private sector investment.
It is
possible to privatize a crown corporation, not by selling
it, but by simply withdrawing from the field. BC Rail's
withdrawal from passenger service with comments that a private
operator may be interested in moving into the business provides
a hint at how BC Hydro could be privitized. Presumably an
operator like the one
offering rail tours through the Rockies would lease
the ability to operate on BC Rails tracks with much the
same outcome as if the passenger service had been sold.
To date no operator has expressed such interest, but comments
from BC Rail make it clear that expressions of interest
would be welcome.
Comments
in Finance Minister Gary Collins' February budget documents
suggest that the same kind of privatization could happen
at BC Hydro. It is not a matter of selling the "core
assets". Instead it is simply a matter of encouraging
the private sector to build all new transmission and generation
facilities so that over time they would occupy an ever larger
share of the electricity market. Meanwhile BC Hydro could
reap ever larger returns for the government by gradually
abandoning its policy of a blended price and moving towards
market pricing. A blended price averages low cost power
from dams with higher cost power from gas turbines. Market
pricing means charging whatever the market will bear. $1
billion per year or more in profits could be made from the
lower cost dams.
February's
budget documents say:
"The
government established a task force to initiate a comprehensive
review of BC's energy policy. An interim report was submitted
in November 2001. On the electricity side, the report calls
for: