February
1 , 2002
Dithering
in Advanced Education
Destruction through Indecision
The
"service plan" for the Ministry of Advanced Education
says "Decisions are pending on the Open
Learning Agency (OLA), Part Time Vocational Training,
TechBC,
the Private Post Secondary Education Commission (pdf),
tuition fee policy and policy changes to Student
Financial Assistance."
The
period from November to February is the most crucial time
for student recruitment. Government has made that task almost
impossible for TechBC and it hasn't helped other institutions.
A government
that claims it wants to stimulate economic growth should
appreciate the importance of planning and certainty. Recent
actions of the Campbell government are more likely to create
chaos and drive out investment.
With
Bill 28 the Campbell government broke contracts with college
teachers and made it possible for management to require
staff to teach distance education. It makes more sense to
keep and strengthen the program delivery and course development
arms of OLA (Open University, Open College) with regard
to distance education, rather than to force all of the other
colleges and universities in B.C. to compete with each other
and with OLA for a finite student body. Why does the Campbell
government want to micromanage the post-secondary sector?
It's a recipe for disaster.
Perhaps
Shirley Bond, Minister of Advanced Education, could explain
how any university can recruit students when it doesn't
even know if it is gong to exist next year. What student
in her or his right mind would apply to such an institution?
How
can an institution raise private funds to endow scholarships
or sponsor research when it doesn't know if it will even
be in existence next month, let alone next year?
How
can an institution recruit and retain "the best and
brightest" faculty and staff when it cannot offer a
job on more than a day to day basis?
How
can an institution motivate students to perform their best
if those students are wondering whether they have wasted
the past year or more of their lives?
What
can government say to local communities when it destroys
investments in institutions that would spur wider economic
development?
How
does one reconcile government's destructive indecision with
references throughout the infamous New Era Document with
respect to more high tech graduates and increased use of
technology?
As the
government breaks promises it is useful to go back to its
New Era Document. You may no longer see it as the backdrop
for staged cabinet meetings but it is still available on
the BC Liberal Website. Page 17 of that document deals with
Advanced Education and says:
"Double
the annual number of graduates in computer science, and
electrical and computer engineering, within five years."
"Work
with employers, post-secondary institutes and the Industry
Training and
Apprenticeship Commission to increase training and apprenticeships
in trades and technical sectors."