December
10, 2001
A
Little Perspective on $129.4 million in Cost Shifting
The
Minister of Health is trying to downplay the size of his
latest round of cost shifting - that's shifting from government
and onto sick people. His
own news release estimates the cost of the shifts at
$129.4 million (and that is per year, each and every year
forever). He has tried to say that private insurance will
pick up some of the costs but picking up those costs would
bankrupt private insurers unless they increased their premiums
by the same amount (plus up to 25% more in order to cover
administration).
The
most recent Medical
Services Plan Fee for Service Payment Statistics available
on the government website are those for fiscal year 1999-2000.
Page 15 of that report provides the following numbers:
|
Specialty
|
Practitioners
|
Services
|
Total
Paid
|
| Chiropractic |
720
|
2,752,211
|
$29,706,624
|
| Naturopathy |
128
|
147,711
|
$1,430,944
|
| Physical
Therapy |
1,222
|
2,626,524
|
$28,891,067
|
| Podiatry |
91
|
508,983
|
$9,781,986
|
| Optometry |
360
|
917,352
|
$37,676,930
|
| Massage
Therapy |
1,299
|
2,191,211
|
$14,487,232
|
| Dental
(msp paid) |
272
|
54,826
|
$5,893,820
|
| All
MDs |
7,545
|
57,359,204
|
$1,592,081,461
|
|
Total:
All Fee
for Service
|
11,638
|
66,564,057
|
$1,720,132,047
|
For
chiropractors alone, there were almost 3 million services
provided and paid for by MSP in 1998-99. Of course, some
folks visited more than once, but at 10 visits per person
those numbers mean 300,000 people just lost out in the cost
shift. A similar number or more lost out because of the
shift on physiotherapy services.
In
total there are 3,820 health care providers and hundreds
of thousands of their patients who will feel the consequences
of the shift in health costs. Those folks might want
to phone their MLA's office, ask for an appointment
and discuss their feelings. A
list of MLA's and their office numbers can be found by clicking
here. (new window)
December
8, 2001
Dramatic
Cost Shifting is Just the Start!
The
shocking revelation that $129 million in health care costs
will be shifted onto sick people is just the start of the
bill for reckless tax cuts. Those who now face significant
bills for chiropractors, physiotherapists and other practitioners
may increasingly turn to physicians and hospitals putting
even more pressure on the system.
Health
Minister Collin Hansen admitted recently that the budget
freeze for health will mean a $700 million shortfall for
fiscal year 2002-03. That means there must be another
$471 million in cuts just to stand still!
A
voice clip from Hansen on CBC radio includes the Minister's
assurance that some people will have the shifted costs picked
up by private insurers through extended health plans.
Hansen appears to be ignoring how much of that cost shift
will go directly back on public sector employers. Most of
the government's extended health plans for public sector
employees are financed on a cost plus basis. That means
all those shifted costs will immediately shift back onto
schools, colleges, universities, hospitals, crown corporations
and government ministries.
I
have submitted a Freedom
of Information Request to determine how much of the shifted
health costs will be shifted right back onto public sector
employers. If those estimates don't exist, it will show
that the self styled good managers are in over their heads.
Some insurers may be hit hard as fully insured plans receive
this unexpected liability, but worst of all will be the
plight of hundreds of thousands of people who get personally
stuck with a choice of doing without or picking up the tab.
September
8, 2001
Shifting
costs isn't good management
If
government cannot afford Pharmacare, then what is that
government going to do about the problems that make
Pharmacare unaffordable?
Shifting
costs from government onto its citizens isn't good management,
particularly when it chooses to shift those costs onto
sick seniors. Shifting costs after cutting taxes
is the same as saying that sick seniors should pay for
the dramatic tax cuts given to the high income earners.
If
drug costs are rising, then they will rise for private
insurers and private payers just as much or more than
when they rise for government. Government is in the best
position to control
those costs and to deal with physicians who may not
engage in the best
prescribing habits. Government is also in the best
position to obtain the research
to determine what new drugs help patients as compared
to what new drugs just help the drug companies.
It
is hard to manage. The drug industry spends $20,000
per year per physician to get them to write prescriptions
for the things that make most money for the drug industry.
It is not easy for government to correct bad prescribing
habits when it is up against those resources. However,
every hospital pharmacist does exactly that kind of
work. In a hospital you get the best drug that works,
not the drug that was most recently pitched to your
family doctor.
In
opposition the Liberals attacked the NDP for years saying
that they were a bunch of incompetents. If the Campbell
government now shifts costs rather than managing the
health system, we'll see the real failures and incompetents.